Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI

2018 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison D. Sheridan ◽  
Sameer K. Nath ◽  
Jamil S. Syed ◽  
Sanjay Aneja ◽  
Preston C. Sprenkle ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Aaron Katz ◽  
Corinne Liu ◽  
Kaitlin E. Kosinski

14 Background: Our practice utilizes a biopsy-based 17 gene test that is clinically validated as a predictor of favorable pathology and used to guide use of active surveillance for men with very low, low, and intermediate risk prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging characteristics and PIRADS score of prostate cancer patients with a Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) indicating favorable pathology. Methods: 300 consecutive 3T Multiparametric Prostate MRI (MP-MRI) were identified from March 26, 2012, to June 29, 2015. Thirty patients (age 44-84 years) with GPS scores indicating favorable pathology were included in the study. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) scores were assigned to each MP-MRI. MRI index lesions were defined as discrete hypointense T2 signal with at least one anatomically corresponding abnormal functional MRI parameter (diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced images). The MRI examinations were evaluated for number and laterality of MRI index lesions and in relation to biopsy pathology findings after the MP-MRI was performed. Results: Out of 30 MP-MRI, 7 (23.3%) PIRADS 5, 10 (33.3%) PIRADS 4, 10 (33.3%) PIRADS 3, 1 (3.3%) PIRADS 2, and 2 (6.7%) PIRADS 1. Thirteen (43%) had bilateral MRI index lesions. Twenty-six (87%) MP-MRI had 1-3 MRI index lesions, 2 (7%) had 4-6 MRI index lesions and 2 (7%) had no index lesions. Six (20%) patients underwent curative treatment. Four (13.3%) patients underwent a transrectal ultrasound guided targeted biopsy and one underwent a prostatectomy after the MP-MRI. One harbored Gleason 7 with a PIRADS 1, 2 harbored Gleason 7 with PIRADS 5, and two were benign with PIRADS scores of 3 and 4. Conclusions: Patients with prostate cancer with a GPS score indicating favorable pathology had PIRADS scores ranging from 5 to 1, with the majority indicating either high or very high likelihood of harboring clinically significant cancer. This may imply that MP-MRI should continue to play an important role in stratifying patients with prostate cancer, even in those with favorable pathology. A study with a larger sample size and biopsy results after the initial MP-MRI to look for tumor upgrading is needed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 20201434
Author(s):  
Yasuyo Urase ◽  
Yoshiko Ueno ◽  
Tsutomu Tamada ◽  
Keitaro Sofue ◽  
Satoru Takahashi ◽  
...  

Objectives: To evaluate the interreader agreement and diagnostic performance of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1, in comparison with v2. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study. Seventy-seven consecutive patients who underwent a prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T before radical prostatectomy were included. Four radiologists (two experienced uroradiologists and two inexperienced radiologists) independently scored eight regions [six peripheral zones (PZ) and two transition zones (TZ)] using v2.1 and v2. Interreader agreement was assessed using κ statistics. To evaluate diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC), area under the curve (AUC) was estimated. Results 228 regions were pathologically diagnosed as positive for csPC. With a cutoff ≥3, the agreement among all readers was better with v2.1 than v2 in TZ, PZ, or both zones combined (κ-value: TZ, 0.509 vs 0.414; PZ, 0.686 vs 0.568; both zones combined, 0.644 vs 0.531). With a cutoff ≥4, the agreement among all readers was also better with v2.1 than v2 in the PZ or both zones combined (κ-value: PZ, 0.761 vs 0.701; both zones combined, 0.756 vs 0.709). For all readers, AUC with v2.1 was higher than with v2 (TZ, 0.826–0.907 vs 0.788–0.856; PZ, 0.857–0.919 vs 0.853–0.902). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the PI-RADS v2.1 could improve the interreader agreement and might contribute to improved diagnostic performance compared with v2. Advances in knowledge: PI-RADS v2.1 has a potential to improve interreader variability and diagnostic performance among radiologists with different levels of expertise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document