Litigation over Marine Resources: Lessons for Law of the Sea, International Dispute Settlement and International Environmental Law

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Klein
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Marine Resources ◽  
International Environmental Law ◽  
International Dispute

scholarly journals [BOOK REVIEW] The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes

2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 211-215
Author(s):  
Davina Oktivana
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Law Students ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
International Environmental Law ◽  
Extensive Analysis ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
International Dispute

Yoshifumi Tanaka is a Professor of International Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen. He has published widely in the fields of the law of the sea and international environmental law. I had a profound admiration for Tanaka’s writings, particularly in law of the sea subjects. He has a compelling method in deliberating issues comprehensively but still convenient to digest, especially for academicians, practitioners, and law students (postgraduate). Settlement of International Dispute is considered as a foundation of the establishment and the development of International Law. Accordingly, there are plenty of books and writings had published addressing similar topic, however, Tanaka’s book is distinctive. Tanaka successfully gives the reader an exhaustive and extensive analysis of the procedures for dispute settlement both in traditional means and newly development. In addition, He complemented figures and tables to give the reader a comprehensive understanding.

scholarly journals The Environmental Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Boyle
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Settlement System ◽  
International Environmental Law ◽  
Environmental Disputes ◽  
Dispute Settlement System ◽  
Marine Environmental ◽  
Environmental Jurisprudence

AbstractThis presentation starts out with an overview of the environmental jurisprudence of international tribunals and courts in the last decade. The author then examines the jurisprudence of the ITLOS and considers four issues that have arisen: the precautionary principle; environmental impact assessment; environmental co-operation; and jurisdiction over marine environmental disputes. Concluding, he asks what the jurisprudence tells us about the Tribunal's role in the LOSC dispute settlement system. First, the Tribunal's provisional measures cases have established the utility of the Article 290 procedure as a means of protecting the rights of other States but also the marine environment in general. Second, there is evidence in the case law of a desire to settle disputes between the parties in a way that contributes to the development of a consistent jurisprudence and of a willingness to interpret and apply Part XII of the Convention in accordance with the contemporary state of international environmental law. The Tribunal's record on marine environmental disputes is a positive one.

The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law

2008 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Policy Development ◽  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Hazardous Substances ◽  
International Environmental Law ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
Normative Development ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
Analytical Tools

This book takes stock of the major developments in international environmental law, while exploring the field's core assumptions and concepts, basic analytical tools, and key challenges. It aims to strike a balance between practical preoccupations and critical or theoretical reflection. Each chapter examines an issue that is central to scholarly debates or policy development. The book consists of forty-seven chapters in seven parts. Part I sets the stage, identifying overarching issues. Part II offers readers a range of theoretical lenses through which to analyse both the problems facing international environmental law and the solutions it may offer. Part III reviews the treatment of basic-issues areas. Part IV analyses the process of normative development in international environmental law. Part V assesses key theoretical concepts. Part VI examines the roles of various actors and institutions, and Part VII analyses issues of implementation and enforcement. Topics range from global environmental governance as administration and its implications for international law, science and technology, international relations theory, ethics and international environmental law, ecosystems and sustainable development, hazardous substances and activities, and international dispute settlement.

Relationship Between International Environmental Law and Other Branches of International Law

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Boyle
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
World Trade Organisation ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Convention On Biological Diversity ◽  
International Environmental Law ◽  
The Law

International environmental law is neither a separate nor a self-contained system or sub-system of law. Rather, it is simply part of international law as a whole. It is true that many ‘environmental’ treaties and other legal instruments have been negotiated over the past half-century, and that the study of international environmental law is to a significant extent a study of these treaties and other instruments. Nevertheless, unlike World Trade Organisation (WTO) law, the law of the sea, or human rights law, international environmental law has never been systematically codified into a single treaty or group of treaties. There is neither a dedicated international environmental organisation nor an international dispute settlement process with the ability to give it coherence. This article provides the link between international environmental law and WTO law, the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, environment and human rights, and dispute settlement and applicable law.

The Scarborough Shoal Dispute: An Analysis of the Dispute Resolution Mechanisms under International Law

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RODEL A. TATON
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Choice Of Procedure ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
The Status ◽  
Rules And Principles ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Unclos

This comes at a time when the stand-off over the Scarborough Shoal has matured to the status of an international dispute. It involves rivaling claims on points of law or fact between the People’s Republic China (PRC) and the Republic of the Philippines (RP). PRC calls the shoal as Huangyan island while RP refers to it as Bajo de Masinloc or Panatag Shoal as advanced and published in their respective governmental positions, albeit their claims for de facto sovereignty and territory. Employing mainly descriptive, historical, documentary and content analyses techniques, this dwells on (a) the character of Scarborough Shoal in the perspective of international law, (b) the conflicting claims of the PRC and RP with their respective governmental positions, (c) the mechanisms for settlement of an international dispute as provided for by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and (d) whether or not the Philippines can avail of the said remedies and how can the Scarborough Shoal be settled employing international law, rules and principles. The UNCLOS provides for a mechanism in Part XV, for settlement of disputes, ranging from the pacific modes of dispute settlement to resort to compulsory mechanisms entailing binding decisions. It is also provided that sans a choice of procedure, only Arbitration under Annex VII, the Hamburg Tribunal, is available, and this, the Philippines followed when it submitted its notification and statement of claims. Based on the international jurisprudence on related issues, there are rarely a winner and a loser. However, having studied the current situation principally in the light of the UNCLOS III, which favors the position of the Philippines, one is forced to recognize that oceans and their basic rules - droit de la mer- existed before UNCLOS. Certainly, the final settlement of the issues hereinbefore presented will go beyond the confines of UNCLOS.Keywords: Social Sciences, International disputes, Law of the Sea, descriptive design,Philippine-China Relations, UNCLOS, Philippines, Southeast Asia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document