scholarly journals Modeled Urea Distribution Volume and Mortality in the HEMO Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1129-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Daugirdas ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
Thomas A. Depner ◽  
Nathan W. Levin ◽  
Glenn M. Chertow
2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Lindley ◽  
P. W. Chamney ◽  
A. Wuepper ◽  
H. Ingles ◽  
J. E. Tattersall ◽  
...  

ASAIO Journal ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 216 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Olde ◽  
J Steraby ◽  
R Persson ◽  
K Wingren ◽  
Alquist Hegbrant M

2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 2262-2271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Wuepper ◽  
James Tattersall ◽  
Matthias Kraemer ◽  
Martin Wilkie ◽  
Lorraine Edwards

1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 1928-1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Daugirdas ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
Thomas A. Depner ◽  
Frank A. Gotch ◽  
Robert A. Star ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 700-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mandolfo ◽  
M. Farina ◽  
E. Imbasciati

Bioimpedance is a simple and non-invasive method of assessing body fluid composition. The aim of our study was to evaluate the reliability of impedance: a) to measure urea distribution volume considered to be coextensive with total body water (TBW); b) to assess the changes in body fluid compartments before and after dialysis; c) to predict hypotensive episodes. In twelve hemodialysis patients, TBW measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) before a dialysis session was significantly correlated with the urea distribution volume estimated by dialysis direct quantification (r=0.64, p < 0.05) and with TBW calculated by the Watson equation (r=0.65, p < 0.05). Anthropometric values were, on average, 4.8% higher. TBW measured by BIA at the end of treatment overestimated fluid losses induced by ultrafiltration by 14% to 70%, while TBW 6 h after dialysis reflected the weight losses. On line BIA during hemodialysis has a very low positive predictive value (41.6%) and poor sensitivity (66%) for the prediction of hypotension. In conclusion, BIA is helpful in assessing the urea distribution volume but is not reliable for assessing acute fluid changes nor for predicting hypotensive episodes related to hemodialysis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
John K. Leypoldt ◽  
Edward F. Vonesh

Background/Aims: We derived a novel equation for calculating weekly urea standard Kt/V (stdKt/V) during hemodialysis (HD) based on urea mass removed, comparable to the approach during peritoneal dialysis. Methods: Theoretical consideration of urea mass balance during HD led to the following equation for stdKt/V, namely, stdKt/V = N × (URR + UFV/V), where N is the number of treatments per week, URR is urea reduction ratio per treatment, UFV is ultrafiltration volume per treatment, and V is postdialysis urea distribution volume. URR required corrections for postdialysis rebound and intradialytic urea generation. We compared the accuracy of this approach with previous equations for stdKt/V by numerical simulations using a 2-compartment model of urea kinetics for thrice-weekly and more frequent HD prescriptions. Results: The proposed equation based on urea mass removed predicted values of stdKt/V that are equivalent to those calculated by previous equations for stdKt/V. Conclusion: This work provides a novel approach for calculating stdKt/V during HD and strengthens the theoretical understanding of stdKt/V.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document