Minimally invasive surgery for low-grade spondylolisthesis: percutaneous endoscopic or oblique lumbar interbody fusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 639-650
Author(s):  
Mengran Jin ◽  
Guokang Xu ◽  
Tong Shen ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Haiyu Shao ◽  
...  

Aim: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of symptomatic low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. Material & methods: The clinical and radiographic records of 48 patients underwent single-level minimally invasive lumbar fusion with a PELIF (n = 16) or OLIF (n = 32) were reviewed. Results: The clinical and radiographic outcomes were similar in both groups. PELIF procedure exhibited superior capability of the enlargement of foraminal width, but inferior capability of the restoration of foraminal height than OLIF procedure. Conclusion: PELIF minimizes the iatrogenic damages and perioperative risks to a great extent, and seems to be a promising option for the treatment of symptomatic low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
AVELINO AGUILAR MERLO ◽  
RICARDO ROJAS BECERRIL ◽  
MARIO LORETO LUCAS ◽  
SHEILA PATRICIA VÁZQUEZ ARTEAGA

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion has fewer complications of chronic lumbar instability compared with traditional open techniques. Methods: Retrospective, observational study of 132 patients with grade I and II lumbar spondylolisthesis with advanced disc degeneration. Forty-five patients operated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF), 45 patients operated by posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and 42 patients operated by open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Results: Four patients had incidental durotomy, two in the TLIF group and two in the PLIF group. There were no cases of incidental durotomy in the minimally invasive transforaminal access group. No patient in the study presented an inadequate screw position, the lowest mean bleeding occurred in the group of minimally invasive instrumentation of one and two levels. There were 6.6% of infections for PLIF group and none in the other two groups. Conclusions: Arthrodesis techniques are not free of complications, however, the frequency is lower with minimally invasive techniques. Nonetheless, it requires training and does not dispense the need for a learning curve for the spine surgeon compared to open lumbar fusion techniques.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Avani Vaishnav ◽  
Joshua Wright-Chisem ◽  
Michael Steinhaus ◽  
Steven Mcanany ◽  
Sravisht Iyer ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION The type of cage used in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) can impact several goals of the procedure, including optimizing disc and foraminal height, interbody fusion, and sagittal balance. METHODS Segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), posterior disc height (PDH) were compared using upright lateral radiographs obtained pre- and postoperatively. Impact of demographic (age, sex, and BMI), preoperative radiographic (SL, LL, and PDH) and operative factors (cage-type, cage-width, and cage-position) on radiographic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Of the 154 patients included, 55 received a static oblique, 63 a static articulating, and 36 an expandable articulating cage. There was no significant difference in SL pre- (P = .389) or postoperatively (P = .613). A difference was seen in change in SL (P = .023), with the expandable articulating cage showing the greatest increase, and an improvement from pre- to postoperatively (P = .033). A significant difference was seen in change in LL (P = .050), with the static oblique and expandable articulating groups maintaining LL (P = .238 and P = .873), but the static articulating group showing decrease in LL (P < .0001). There was a significant difference in PDH pre- and postoperatively (P < .0001 and P = .045). All three cages increased in PDH (P < .0001), with the expandable articulating cage showing the greatest increase (P = .009). Regressions showed that preoperative SL was the only significant predictor of postoperative SL (P < .0001; R2 = 0.418) and change in SL (P < .0001; R2 = 0.247); preoperative LL of postoperative LL (P < .0001; R2 = 0.609) and change in LL (P < .0001; R2 = 0.227); and preoperative PDH of postoperative PDH (P < .0001; R2 = 0.360) and change in PDH (P < .0001; R2 = 0.299). Cage-type, cage-position, and cage-width were not significant predictors of radiographic parameters. CONCLUSION Preoperative radiographic parameters were predictors of postoperative parameters. While the static cages maintained SL, the expandable cage increased SL. The expandable cage had the lowest preoperative PDH, likely reflective of the expandable technology allowing for cage-insertion even in collapsed disc spaces. The expandable articulating cage demonstrated benefit in increasing SL, maintaining LL and causing the greatest increase in PDH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document