scholarly journals Avoiding “toxic knowledge”: the importance of framing personalized risk information in clinical decision-making

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Kristin M Kostick ◽  
J S Blumenthal-Barby
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e0228725
Author(s):  
Monica Solbiati ◽  
James V. Quinn ◽  
Franca Dipaola ◽  
Piergiorgio Duca ◽  
Raffaello Furlan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document