scholarly journals Spatial variability of soil nutrients and GIS-based nutrient management in upland of Tamil Nadu: A case study from Valapadi Block, Salem district

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 2801-2809
Author(s):  
Balasubramanian V ◽  
KP Ragunath ◽  
R Srinivasan ◽  
E Manikandan ◽  
S Parvathy ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-343
Author(s):  
Deepak Ghimire ◽  
Bandhu Raj Baral ◽  
Dinesh Panday

A proper understanding of variability of soil chemical properties over an area is important for identifying the soil nutrients related production constraints. The suggestions for remedial measures and execution of appropriate nutrient management strategies are also based on the good knowledge of variation in soil nutrients. A case study was undertaken with an objective of assessing spatial variability of selected soil chemical properties of agricultural land. Soil samples from the surface (0 to 15 cm) were collected from farmers’ field in the central part of Kavrepalanchowk district of Nepal in February 2018. Soil samples were analyzed for soil pH, total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K). Descriptive statistics revealed that the soil in the study area was slightly acidic and contained the low status of TOC, P, and K, while the N content was medium. Coefficient of variation (CV) indicated that soil pH was the least variable (CV= 9.37% with values ranging from 5.3 to 7.7) among the investigated soil samples while N was the most variable (CV= 98.81% with content values ranging from 0.03% to 0.67%). Other selected properties (TOC, P, and K) were found to be highly variable (CV= 49.94%, 94.89%, and 57.53% respectively). These variations in soil chemical properties were mostly related to the different cropping systems and soil management practices, including nutrient management carried out in the study area. Owing to the higher variability of nutrients, the results suggested to take into account various soil and nutrient management practices for sustained soil fertility and enhanced productivity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 181 (6) ◽  
pp. 827-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Dai ◽  
Yuhuan Li ◽  
Weijun Fu ◽  
Peikun Jiang ◽  
Keli Zhao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Jing ◽  
Min Qingwen ◽  
Li Wenhua ◽  
Bai Yanying ◽  
Dhruba Bijaya G. C ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 965-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Zhiping Yang ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Deli Chen ◽  
Jianjie Zhang ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Srinivasamoorthy ◽  
S. Chidambaram ◽  
M. V. Prasanna ◽  
M. Vasanthavihar ◽  
John Peter ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 408-409
Author(s):  
Dr. A. Serma Saravana Pandian ◽  
◽  
Dr. K. N. Selvakumar Dr. K. N. Selvakumar ◽  
Dr. M. Prabu Dr. M. Prabu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document