scholarly journals Management of diaphyseal fractures of both bones of forearm by internal fixation using locking compression plate and screws

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1g) ◽  
pp. 467-471
Author(s):  
Dr. Veeresh Patage ◽  
Dr. Sandeep KM
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 842-847
Author(s):  
Aasupathri Pavana Kumar Babu ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Mallepogu ◽  
Sreekanth Reddy B. ◽  
Thadi Raghavendera Rao

Author(s):  
Mallesh Rathod ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Kanugula ◽  
Pannuri Raja

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between open reduction and internal fixation by locking compression plate (LCP) and closed reduction and internal fixation with anterograde interlocking nail (ILN) for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a prospective comparative study, with diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated by LCP in 30 patients and with ILN in 30 patients. Patients were followed up to 18 months. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed in terms of union, complications, reoperation rate and functional outcome using the American shoulder and elbow surgeons’ score (ASES) and Stewart and Hundley’s criteria.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Union was achieved in 93.3% of patients in LCP group and 90% in ILN group. The mean blood loss in LCP group was 280±22.10 ml (160-400 ml) and in ILN group was 110±17.62 ml (70-150 ml) (p=0.001). The ASES score was 42.47±5.532 in LCP group and 40.93±6.330 in nailing group (p=0.320; p&gt;0.05). Stewart Hundley criteria showed excellent and good results in 26/30 and 17/30 patients in LCP group and ILN group respectively (p=0.070; p&gt;0.05). Complications and re-operation rate were higher in ILN group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our study concludes that LCP can be considered a better surgical option for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus as it had lower incidence of complications, less re-operation rate and better union rate. However, there is no difference between the two groups in terms of union time and functional outcome.</p>


Author(s):  
S. P. S. Gill ◽  
Ankit Mittal ◽  
Manish Raj ◽  
Pulkesh Singh ◽  
Sunil Kumar ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The inception of Locking Compression Plate (LCP) has revolutionized fracture management. With their dramatic success for articular fractures, there is a speculation that they might be more appropriate for diaphyseal fractures as well.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">In this randomized prospective cohort study, 56 patients with diaphyseal fractures involving both bones of forearm were segregated into two groups based on internal fixation with Limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP)(n=28) or with Locking compression plate (LCP)(n=26). Clinical and radiological parameters were studied and functional evaluation was done with Disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Andersons’ criteria was employed to categorize the functional results. The mean duration of surgery and time to union were discovered to be less in favor of LCP group although statistically insignificant. No significant differences in two groups with respect to the functional evaluation (range of movement, Andersons’ criteria and DASH score) and complications could be discerned. No incidence of refracture or synostosis was encountered in any of the group. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Although LCP is an effective treatment alternative and may have a subtle edge over LC-DCP in the management of these fractures, their supremacy could not be certified. We deduce that surgical planning and expertise rather than the choice of implant are more pivotal for outstanding results.</span></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 3266-3269
Author(s):  
Abhishek Patil

Proximal humerus fractures account for about 4% to 5% of all fractures. Following distal forearm fracture, proximal humeral fracture is the second most common upper extremity fracture. Kirschner (K)-Wires, external fixation, tension band wiring, and rush pins, intramedullary nails, ORIF with plates, and shoulder hemiarthroplasty have all been offered as therapeutic options. The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome and complication rates following internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a locking compression plate. Patients over the age of 18 with closed proximal humerus fractures or open proximal humerus fractures (Gustilo and Anderson type I, Type II) received open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate in the current study. The participants in this study were 60 people who had a proximal humerus fracture and were treated with open reduction and a proximal humerus locking compression plate. Patients ranged in age from 20 to 85 years old, with a mean age of 51.14 +/- 17.30 years. The age group 36–55 years (37 percent) was the most prevalent, followed by 56–75 years (30 %). The majority of patients (76.7 %) were men who had been in automobile accidents on the right side (83 %) (63 %). According to the Neer classification, the most prevalent type of fracture was a three-part fracture (53 %). The maximum union time observed in this study was 16 weeks, with a minimum of 10 weeks. The average time to union is 12.52 +/- 1.14 weeks. The mean flexion at the end of six months was 121.660 +/- 19.84. The mean internal rotation was 57.330 +/- 8.48, the mean external rotation was 530 +/- 11.98, and the mean abduction was 1180 +/- 19.36. 75.28 +/- 9.66 [Mean +/- SD] is the Mean Constant score. Pain 14.10, ADL 18.26, range of motion 22.46, and power 20 were the mean scores observed on Constant Score for its various aspects. According to the Constant score, the functional outcome of the 60 patients was as follows: 8 patients had excellent outcomes (13%), 34 patients had good outcomes (56.7%), 16 patients had moderate outcomes (26.7%), and two patients had poor outcomes (26.7%) and (3 %). Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate results in anatomical reduction and secure fixation, resulting in a favorable functional outcome.


Author(s):  
Sivakumar Arumugam ◽  
Venkateshwara Arumugam ◽  
V. Raviraman

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Proximal humerus fractures accounts for about 4 to 5% of all fractures.  Treatment of unstable, displaced, and comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus remain challenging. Significant controversy continues regarding the best methods of treating displaced proximal humerus fractures. Various operative procedures are carried out, the recent trend in internal fixation has moved on to locking plates. The present study is undertaken to evaluate the functional outcome and complication of proximal humerus fractures treated by locking compression plate.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a prospective study comprising of 30 patients with fractures of proximal humerus were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate were evaluated at Velammal  Institute Of Medical  Sciences, Madurai from the period of April 2015 to December 2016. Clinical and radiological evaluation was done. Patients will undergo open reduction internal fixation with locking compression plate for the sustained fracture under general anesthesia.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In our series, the majority of the patients were males, elderly aged, with RTA being the commonest mode of injury, involving 2 part, 3 part and 4 part fractures of the proximal humerus. Excellent and satisfactory results were found in 76.7% of patients with unsatisfactory results in 23.3 % according to Neer’s criteria. There were 100 % union rates and no failures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> In conclusion locking Compression, the plate is an advantageous implant in proximal humeral fractures due to angular stability, particularly in comminuted fractures and in Osteoporotic bones in elderly patients, thus allowing early mobilization.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1o) ◽  
pp. 1003-1011
Author(s):  
Dr. Umesh Nagrale ◽  
Dr. Sagar Kadam ◽  
Dr Ravi Bhanushali ◽  
Dr. Prasannaditya mujumdar ◽  
Dr. Avik Sarkar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document