scholarly journals Efficacy of conventional method of preoperative templating in implant size selection in patent undergoing total hip arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1073-1077
Author(s):  
Dr. Akshay Kumar Sharma ◽  
Dr. Kamparsh Thakur ◽  
Dr. CM Singh ◽  
Dr. Yogesh Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Conventional Method ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Size Selection ◽  
Preoperative Templating ◽  
Implant Size

scholarly journals Templating Hip Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 672-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amro Alnahhal ◽  
Nayef Aslam-Pervez ◽  
Hassaan Q. Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Reliable Method ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Digital Templating ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Preoperative Templating ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Implant Size

BACKGROUND: Different methods have been developed and employed with variable degrees of success in pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty. Preoperative templating, especially digital templating, has been claimed to have increased the effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty by improving the precision of prediction of prosthetic implant size. AIMS: The overall aim of this systematic review is to identify whether the use of pre-operative templating in total hip arthroplasty procedures has resulted in increased accuracy, reliability and precision of the procedure. Various methods of templating, like traditional acetate overlay and digital method of templating that includes a single radiographic marker and double radiographic marker methods, have been compared to establish the most reliable method of templating. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Google Scholar Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and MEDLINE (1966 to present), EMBASE (1980 to present), CINAHL (1982 to present), Psych INFO (1967 to present) and Clinical Trials Gov. CONCLUSION: The results of this systemic review suggest that preoperative templating is resulting in an enormous increase in the accuracy of total hip arthroplasty and among various methods, King Mark is the most reliable method.

scholarly journals A Novel Measurement Using Digital Radiography to Minimize Fluoroscopy in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Yun ◽  
Marilena Qutami ◽  
Kory B. Dylan Pasko
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Fluoroscopy Time ◽  
Lesser Trochanter ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Preoperative Templating ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Templating Technique

AbstractPreoperative templating for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is fraught with uncertainty. Specifically, the conventional measurement of the lesser trochanter to the center (LTC) of the femoral head used in preoperative planning is easily measured on a template but not measurable intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of a novel measurement that is reproducible both on templating and in surgery as a more accurate and practical guide. We retrospectively reviewed 201 patients with a history of osteoarthritis who underwent primary THA. For preoperative templating, the distance from the top of the lesser trochanter to the equator (LeTE) of the femoral head was measured on a calibrated digital radiograph with a neutral pelvis. This measurement was used intraoperatively to guide the choice of the trial neck and head. As with any templating technique, the goal was to construct a stable, impingement-free THA with equivalent leg lengths and hip offset. In evaluating this novel templating technique, the primary outcomes measured were the number of trial reductions and the amount of fluoroscopic time, exposures, and radiation required to obtain a balanced THA reconstruction. Using the LeTE measurement, the mean number of trial reductions was 1.21, the mean number of intraoperative fluoroscopy images taken was 2.63, the mean dose of radiation exposure from fluoroscopy was 0.02 mGy, and the mean fluoroscopy time per procedure was 0.6 seconds. In hips templated with the conventional LTC prior to the LeTE, the mean fluoroscopy time was 0.9 seconds. There was a statistically significant difference in fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001). The LeTE is a reproducible measurement that transfers reliably from digital templating to surgery. This novel preoperative templating metric reduces the fluoroscopy time and consequent radiation exposure to the surgical team and may minimize the number of trial reductions.

scholarly journals Implications of component size and calibration error on digital templating for total hip arthroplasty. A visual matrix from a simple mathematical model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Kolja Boese ◽  
Tim Rolvien ◽  
Matthias Trost ◽  
Michael Frink ◽  
Jan Hubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Calibration Error ◽  
Optimal Size ◽  
Linear Calibration ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Digital Templating ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Implant Size

Abstract Objective Preoperative digital templating is a standard procedure in total hip arthroplasty. Deviations between template size and final implant size may result from inaccurate calibration, templating as well as intraoperative decisions. So far, the explicit effect of calibration errors on templating has not been addressed adequately. Materials and Methods A mathematical simulation of calibration errors up to ± 24% was applied to the templating of acetabular cups (38 to 72 mm diameter). The effect of calibration errors on template component size as deviation from optimal size was calculated. Results The relationship between calibration error and component size deviation is inverse and linear. Calibration errors have a more pronounced effect on larger component sizes. Calibration errors of 2–6% result in templating errors of up to two component sizes. Common errors of up to 12% may result in templating errors of 3–4 sizes for common implant sizes. A tabular matrix visualizes the effect. Conclusion Calibration errors play a significant role in component size selection during digital templating. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of this effect and try to identify and address this source of error.

Is computerised 3D templating more accurate than 2D templating to predict size of components in primary total hip arthroplasty?

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Schiffner ◽  
David Latz ◽  
Pascal Jungbluth ◽  
Jan P Grassmann ◽  
Stephan Tanner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Diagnosis ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Primary Thas ◽  
Implant Size ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) and computed tomography (CT)-based 3-dimensional (3D) measures. Methods: One hundred and sixteen consecutive primary THAs were analysed. The preoperative diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in all cases. The 2D templating and the 3D templating were performed by two different residents. All templating results were available for the orthopaedic surgeon performing the procedure. Accuracies with regard to the predicted and actual implant sizes were determined for each procedure. Implantation of the size as planned was defined as “exact”, whereas the use of components within one size larger or smaller (±1) as planned were defined as “accurate.” Results: The 3D templating was significantly more accurate in predicting implant sizing compared to 2D templating for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The difference was statistically significant for the cup templating (‘‘exact’’ p = 0.02; ‘‘accurate’’ p = 0.01) and for the stem templating (‘‘exact’’ p = 0.04; ‘‘accurate’’ p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our results support the superiority of 3D templating over 2D templating in predicting implant size.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document