scholarly journals Functional outcome of surgical management of ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 773-776
Author(s):  
Dr. T. H Prakashappa ◽  
Dr. Bharath Raja B S ◽  
Dr. Yogananda Gali Hanumaih ◽  
Dr. Appasab Jaipal Murugunde
Author(s):  
Conner J. Paez ◽  
Benjamin M. Lurie ◽  
Vidyadhar V. Upasani ◽  
Andrew T. Pennock

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes of adolescents with and without ankle syndesmotic injuries and identify predictors of functional outcome after operative ankle fractures. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on operative adolescent ankle fractures treated between 2009 and 2019 with a minimum of one-year follow-up (mean 4.35 years). Patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation (SF) (n = 48) were compared with operative ankle fractures without syndesmotic injury (n = 63). Functional outcomes were assessed using standardized questionnaires, specifically the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation. Results: There were no differences in patient-reported outcomes, rates of return to sport or complications between groups with and without SF. The SF group had a longer tourniquet time (p = 0.04), duration of non-weight-bearing (p = 0.01), more Weber C fibula fractures (p < 0.001), fewer medial malleolus fractures (p = 0.03) and more frequently underwent implant removal (p < 0.0001). Male sex, lower body mass index (BMI) and longer duration of follow-up were significant predictors of a higher FAAM sports score using multivariable linear regression. SF was not a predictor of functional outcome. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that patients that undergo surgical fixation of syndesmotic injuries have equivalent functional outcomes compared to operative ankle fractures without intraoperative evidence of syndesmotic injury. We also identified that male sex, lower BMI and longer duration of follow-up are predictors of a good functional outcome. Level of Evidence: III


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choon Chiet Hong ◽  
Shuvendu Prosad Roy ◽  
Nazrul Nashi ◽  
Ken Jin Tan

Author(s):  
Andrew M. Schwartz ◽  
Rishin J. Kadakia ◽  
Jason T. Bariteau

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Direk Tantigate ◽  
Gavin Ho ◽  
Joshua Kirschenbaum ◽  
Henrik C. Bäcker ◽  
Benjamin Asherman ◽  
...  

Background. Fracture dislocation of the ankle represents a substantial injury to the bony and soft tissue structures of the ankle. There has been only limited reporting of functional outcome of ankle fracture-dislocations. This study aimed to compare functional outcome after open reduction internal fixation in ankle fractures with and without dislocation. Methods. A retrospective chart review of surgically treated ankle fractures over a 3- year period was performed. Demographic data, type of fracture, operative time and complications were recorded. Of 118 patients eligible for analysis, 33 (28%) sustained a fracture-dislocation. Mean patient age was 46.6 years; 62 patients, who had follow-up of at least 12 months, were analyzed for functional outcome assessed by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). The median follow-up time was 37 months. Demographic variables and FAOS were compared between ankle fractures with and without dislocation. Results. The average age of patients sustaining fracture-dislocation was greater (53 vs 44 years, P = .017); a greater percentage were female (72.7% vs 51.8%, P = .039) and diabetic (24.2% vs 7.1%, P = .010). Wound complications were similar between both groups. FAOS was generally poorer in the fracture-dislocation group, although only the pain subscale demonstrated statistical significance (76 vs 92, P = .012). Conclusion. Ankle fracture-dislocation occurred more frequently in patients who were older, female, and diabetic. At a median of just > 3-year follow-up, functional outcomes in fracture-dislocations were generally poorer; the pain subscale of FAOS was worse in a statistically significant fashion. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Ravindra Prasad ◽  
L B Manjhi

Introduction: Distal humerus fracture in adults particularly complete articular (AO/OTA Type C) remain some of the most difficult injuries to manage. Complex anatomy of distal humerus combined with multifragmented fracture, sparse soft tissue cover with adjacent neurovascular structures poses great difficulty for treatment. Goal of treatment is to obtain a painless, stable and mobile elbow joint through a systematic approach. Aim: to study the functional outcome of surgical management of complete articular distal humerus fracture in adults. Method: a prospective study comprising of 20 patients treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation using Orthogonal plating (dorsolateral and medial 3.5mm LCP) through trans olecranon approach. Result: Mean age of patients was 36.6 years (range 19 to 58 years) with male dominance, most fractures were of type 13C1 (AO/OTA). RTA accounts for most common mode of injury, majority of them being left sided. Mean operative time was 130 minutes. Complications included one case of superficial infection, 3 cases of ulnar neuropathy and non-union in 2 cases. Mean range of motion of elbow was 89 degree. Functional outcome assessed using Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) shown Excellent result in 12 cases, good to fair results in 6 and poor result in 2 cases. Conclusion: Anatomical restoration of joint surface and rigid internal fixation with bicolumnar orthogonal plating allowing early range of motion is the key for obtaining good functional results in complete articular distal humerus fractures. However, outcomes do deteriorate with increasing fracture complexity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (77) ◽  
pp. 13526-13530
Author(s):  
Sankara Rao S ◽  
Chandra Sekaram Naidu M ◽  
Dharma Rao V ◽  
Arun Kumar V ◽  
Sravya Teja P

Author(s):  
Vivek Phanswal

Background: Clavicle Fractures is one of the common fractures of upper limb accounting for approximately 40 % of all shoulder fractures. Till recently all clavicle fracture were treated conservatively, but now interest in surgical management is rising. This study was carried out to see if Surgical management outweighs the conservative treatment of Fractures Of Clavicle. Methods: A total of 40 cases satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Alternate patients were allocated to operative and conservation groups. In total 20 patients were operated operatively and 20 patients were treated conservatively. Outcome was analysed in terms of radiological union and functional outcome of the patient. Constant and Murley score was used as a score to evaluate final outcome. Results: In this study, the 20 patients who were operated upon had an average union time of 7.8 weeks; 1 patient had delayed fracture union by 12 wks. 20 patients in conservative group had normal union of fractures with 1 patient going into non-union. Average union time in the conservative group was 9.4 weeks, which was more than the 7.8 weeks seen in the group treated operatively. Mal-union was present in 7 of the 20 patients treated conservatively, and 5 of these 7 had a visible deformity. Out of these patients with mal-union 1 had poor functional outcome, 3 had good to excellent outcome and 3 had satisfactory functional outcome. 4 of these had restricted movements terminally and 2 had pain on movement. Conclusions: From our study based on patients of clavicle fractures, it can be concluded that the operative group had significantly higher excellent outcomes as compared to the conservatively- managed group, based on the Constant and Murley score. Keywords: Clavicle Fractures, Constant and Murley Score, Operative Clavicle Fracture Management, Clavicle Fracture Functional Outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document