A TRIPLICIDADE DO ESPAÇO E DAS PRÁTICAS COTIDIANAS DE MOBILIDADE PARA O ESTUDO DA FRAGMENTAÇÃO SOCIOESPACIAL

O presente artigo pretende demostrar a relevância de um conceito amplo de mobilidade cotidiana para o estudo dos processos de fragmentação socioespacial no contexto urbano. Para este propósito, a ideia lefebvriana de triplicidade do espaço permite propor uma visão ampla da mobilidade cotidiana, desde as estruturas e infraestruturas e modelos de mobilidade, até as práticas individuais, que se articulam com a análise dos processos de fragmentação socioespacial. A mobilidade, instrumento de fragmentação, de alienação e de exclusão, pode também revelar seu potencial de resistência contra o poder hegemônico. A partir de um conjunto de dados coletados, de experiências e pesquisas realizadas ao longo de dez anos no tema da mobilidade, a presente proposta trará principalmente o contexto brasileiro para sustentar o argumento principal.Palavras-Chave: Mobilidade cotidiana; Fragmentação socioespacial; Triplicidade do espaço; Práticas espaciais; Cotidiano. THE TRIPLICITY OF SPACE AND EVERYDAY MOBILITY FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIOSPATIAL FRAGMENTATION Abstract: This article aims to discuss the relevance of a broad concept of daily mobility by studying socio-spatial fragmentation processes in urban contexts. For this purpose, we applied the Lefebvrian idea regarding the triplicity of space. This concept allows us to propose a substantial vision of daily mobility from structures, infrastructures, and models. Additionally, it also provides an understanding of individual practices who articulate themselves with the analysis of socio-spatial fragmentation. The mobility can be interpreted as an instrument of fragmentation, alienation, and exclusion; however, it could also reveal its potential for resistance against hegemonic powers. Based on a compilation of data on the mobility question, from previous research and experiences collected through ten years, the current article is based on the Brazilian context to support our main argument.Keywords: Daily Mobility; Socio-spatial fragmentation; Triplicity of space; Spatial practices; Everyday life. LA TRIPLICITÉ DE L’ESPACE ET LA MOBILITÉ QUOTIDIENNE POUR L’ÉTUDE DE LA FRAGMENTATION SOCIO-SPATIALE Résumé: Cet article prétend démontrer la pertinence d’un concept ample de mobilité quotidienne pour l’analyse des processus de fragmentation socio-spatiale dans le contexte urbain. Pour ce faire, l’idée lefebvrienne de triplicité de l’espace permet de proposer une vision ample de la mobilité quotidienne, que ce soit à partir des structures, infrastructures et modèles de mobilité, ou en termes de pratiques individuelles, qui s’articulent avec l’analyse des processus de fragmentation socio-spatiale. La mobilité, instrument de fragmentation, d’aliénation et d’exclusion, peut également révéler son potentiel de résistance contre le pouvoir hégémonique. À partir d’un ensemble de données collectées, d’expériences et de recherches réalisées au long des dix dernières années dans le thème de la mobilité, la proposition, ici, se basera principalement sur le contexte brésilien pour soutenir l’argument principal.Mots-clés: Mobilité quotidienne ; Fragmentation socio-spatiale ; Triplicité de l’espace ; Pratiques spatiales ; Quotidien.

Download Full-text

MOBIS-COVID19/06: Results as of 11/05/2020

10.31124/advance.12310316 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Joseph Molloy ◽

Christopher Tchervenkov ◽

Thomas Schatzmann ◽

Beaumont Schoeman ◽

Beat Hintermann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Everyday Life ◽

Research Project ◽

Daily Mobility ◽

The University ◽

At Home

To slow down the spread of the Coronavirus, the population has been instructed to stay at home if possible. This measure consequently has a major impact on our daily mobility behaviour. But who is being affected, and how? The MOBIS-COVID-19 research project, an initiative of ETH Zurich and the University of Basel, is a continuation of the original MOBIS study. The aim of the project is to get a picture of how the crisis is affecting mobility and everyday life in Switzerland.

Download Full-text

“Trabalho-lazeando” e o “prédio antigo” na “esquina” do bairro de Nazaré em Belém (PA)

ILUMINURAS ◽

10.22456/1984-1191.53147 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 16 (37) ◽

Author(s):

Rosangela Marques de Britto

Keyword(s):

Everyday Life ◽

Social Groups ◽

Ethnographic Study ◽

Spatial Practices ◽

Urban Street ◽

Individual Memory

O artigo resulta de parte do estudo etnográfico do cotidiano e das memórias de indivíduos e grupos sociais urbanos, realizado entre 2012 até março de 2014, que priorizou compreender e interpretar as relações dos agrupamentos humanos no entorno do patrimônio musealizado, onde foi instalado, em 1984, o Museu da Universidade Federal do Pará. Estas formas e conteúdos do cotidiano se processam pelas matérias das recordações dos quatro interlocutores acerca dos usos do espaço social-urbano da rua, situados nas calçadas da “esquina” do entorno do museu localizado no bairro de Nazaré, na cidade de Belém. Pretendo descrever as narrativas destes interlocutores a partir da “etnografia de rua” de suas representações e práticas espaciais de trabalhar nas ruas. Ao final, descreverei as perspectivas êmicas destes trabalhadores de rua em relação à circulação das pessoas no “dentro” e no “fora” do muro (jardim) do museu, e sobre as mudanças e permanências daquela paisagem urbana e o significado de seus ofícios/trabalhos.Palavras-chave: Espaço urbano e social. Práticas de sociabilidade na rua. Memória Individual e Coletiva. “Etnografia de rua”. Patrimônio histórico musealizado."Work-leisuring" and the "old building" on the "corner" of Nazaré neighborhood in Belém (PA)AbstractThe article results from part of the ethnographic study of everyday life and memories of individuals and urban social groups, conducted between 2012 until March 2014, which prioritized understand and interpret the relationships of human groups surround of musealized heritage, where it was installed in 1984 Museum of the Federal University of Pará. These forms and contents of the memories materials are processed daily for four interlocutors, about the uses of social-urban street spot located on the sidewalks of the "corner" surround of the museum located in the Nazaré neighborhood, in Belém. Intend to describe the narratives of these interlocutors from the "street ethnography" of your representations and spatial practices of work on the streets. At the end describe the emic perspectives of these four street workers in relation to the movement of people "inside" and "outside" the wall (garden) of the museum, and on the changes and continuities of the landscape of the streets and the meaning of their crafts / jobs.Key-words: Social and urban spot. Practices of sociability on the streets. Collective and individual memory. "Street ethnography". Historic heritage musealized.

Download Full-text

MOBIS-COVID19/25: Results as of 19/10/2020 (post-lockdown)

10.31124/advance.13689514 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Joseph Molloy ◽

Christopher Tchervenkov ◽

Thomas Schatzmann ◽

Beaumont Schoeman ◽

Beat Hintermann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Everyday Life ◽

Research Project ◽

Daily Mobility ◽

Mobility Behaviour ◽

The University ◽

At Home

To slow down the spread of the Coronavirus, the population has been instructed to stay at home if possible. This measure consequently has a major impact on our daily mobility behaviour. But who is being affected, and how? The MOBIS-COVID-19 research project, an initiative of ETH Zurich and the University of Basel, is a continuation of the original MOBIS study. The aim of the project is to get a picture of how the crisis is affecting mobility and everyday life in Switzerland.

Download Full-text

Shared technology making in neoliberal ruins

10.31219/osf.io/k793w ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sung-Yueh Perng

Keyword(s):

Everyday Life ◽

Open Innovation ◽

Smart City ◽

Public Life ◽

Local Communities ◽

Urban Spaces ◽

Future Possibility ◽

The Future ◽

Urban Contexts ◽

The Right

Shared technology making refers to the practices, spaces and events that bear the hope and belief that collaborative and open ways of designing, making and modifying technology can improve our ways of living. Shared technology making in the context of the smart city reinvigorates explorations of the possibility of free, open and collaborative ways of engineering urban spaces, infrastructures and public life. Open innovation events and civic hacking initiatives often encourage members of local communities, residents, or city administrations to participate so that the problems they face and the knowledge they possess can be leveraged to develop innovations from the working (and failure) of urban everyday life and (non-)expert knowledges. However, the incorporation of shared technology making into urban contexts engender concerns around the right to participate in shared technology- and city-making. This paper addresses this issue by suggesting ways to consider both the neoliberal patterning of shared technology making and the patches and gaps that show the future possibility of shared city making. It explores the ways in which shared technology making are organised using hackathons and other hacking initiatives as an example. By providing a hackathon typology and detailed accounts of the experiences of organisers and participants of related events, the paper reconsiders the neoliberalisation of shared technology making. It attends to the multiple, entangled and conflictual relationships that do not follow corporate logic for considering the possibilities of more open and collaborative ways of technology- and city-making.

Download Full-text