scholarly journals Effects of the use of preoperative GnRHa analogue and intra-operative mechanical tourniquet for myomectomy on surgical blood loss: A randomised controlled trial

Author(s):  
Salwa Abdullahi Idle ◽  
Helen Coles ◽  
Salma Ayis ◽  
Nitish Narvekar

Objective To compare the pre-operative use of GnRH analogue and/or intra-operative use of tourniquets to determine which intervention best reduces the intraoperative blood loss at open myomectomy. Design Randomised controlled trial, partially blinded (clinician and participant) Setting Single tertiary centre Population Women requiring open myomectomy in our gynaecology outpatient clinic Methods Patients were allocated to receive either pre-operative GnRHa, intra-operative mechanical tourniquet or a combination of preoperative GnRHa and intra-operative mechanical tourniquet. Main Outcome Measure Mean intraoperative blood loss Results There was a difference in mean intra-operative blood loss of groups GnRHa (n=14) versus Tourniquet (n=12) (752ml, 95% CI 148ml-1355ml, p=0.01) and groups GnRHa versus GnRHa+ Tourniquet (n=17) (804ml, 95% CI 250ml-1357ml, p=0.002). No significant difference in intra-operative blood loss between groups Tourniquet and GnRHa+ Tourniquet (52ml, 95% CI -630ml-526ml, p=1) were detected. A sub-analysis showed that there is no statistical significance (p=0.45) between mean blood loss at surgery and uterine size across the groups. Conclusions The use of a mechanical tourniquet with or without pre-operative gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues is significantly more effective at reducing intraoperative blood loss at open myomectomy than the use of pre-operative gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues alone Tweetable Abstract Mechanical tourniquet with or without GnRHa significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss at open myomectomy EudraCT Number 2010-019810-26

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 1142-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
S J Frampton ◽  
M J A Ward ◽  
V S Sunkaraneni ◽  
H Ismail-Koch ◽  
Z A Sheppard ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective:This trial aimed to compare the guillotine technique of tonsillectomy with ‘cold steel’ dissection, the current ‘gold standard’.Design:A single centre, randomised, controlled trial.Methods:One hundred children aged 3 to 11 years who were listed for bilateral tonsillectomy were recruited. Patients had one tonsil removed by each technique, and were blinded to the side. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, haemostasis requirement and post-operative pain scores were recorded and compared.Results:Operative time and intra-operative blood loss were both significantly less for the guillotine technique (p < 0.001) and there was a significantly reduced haemostasis requirement (p < 0.001). Pain was also less on the guillotine side (p < 0.001). There were no tonsillar remnants or palatal trauma for either technique. There was no significant difference between techniques in the frequency of secondary haemorrhage.Conclusion:This study provides level Ib evidence that guillotine tonsillectomy in children with mobile tonsils is an effective and time-efficient procedure which produces less intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain than cold steel dissection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document