scholarly journals Review of the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the nervous system

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slobodan Dozic ◽  
Dubravka Cvetkovic-Dozic ◽  
Milica Skender-Gazibara ◽  
Branko Dozic

(Conclusion) Classifications of the nervous system tumors should be neither static nor definitive. The most recent, third, current WHO classification of nervous system tumors was published in 2000. Many substantial changes were introduced. New entities include the chordoid glioma of the third ventricle, the atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, cerebellar liponeurocytoma (the former lipomatous medulloblstoma of the cerebellum), solitary fibrous tumor and perineurioma. The new tumor variants include the large cell medulloblastoma, tanacytic ependymoma and rhabdoid meningioma. Several essential changes were introduced in the meningiomas regarding histological subtypes, grading and proliferation index. In addition to new entities described in the 2000 WHO classification there are newly brain tumor entities and tumor variants, which are not included in the current classification due to the insufficient number of reporeted cases, for example papillary glioneuronal tumor, rosetted glioneuronal tumor, lipoastrocytoma and lipomatous meningioma. They will be probably accepted in the next WHO classificaton. In the current WHO classification the importance of cytogenetic and molecular biologic investigation in the understanding and further classifications of these tumors has been emphasized.

2017 ◽  
Vol 141 (12) ◽  
pp. 1633-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Pisapia

Context.— In the recently updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors, our concept of infiltrating gliomas as a molecular dichotomy between oligodendroglial and astrocytic tumors has been codified. Advances in animal models of glioma and a wealth of sophisticated molecular analyses of human glioma tissue have led to a greater understanding of some of the biologic underpinnings of gliomagenesis. Objective.— To review our understanding of gliomagenesis in the setting of the recently updated WHO classification of central nervous system tumors. Topics addressed include a summary of an updated diagnostic schema for infiltrating gliomas, the crucial importance of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations, candidate cells of origin for gliomas, environmental and other posited contributing factors to gliomagenesis, and the possible role of chromatin topology in setting the stage for gliomagenesis. Data Sources.— We conducted a primary literature search using PubMed. Conclusions.— With multidimensional molecular data sets spanning increasingly larger numbers of patients with infiltrating gliomas, our understanding of the disease at the point of surgical resection has improved dramatically and this understanding is reflected in the updated WHO classification. Animal models have demonstrated a diversity of candidates for glioma cells of origin, but crucial questions remain, including the role of neural stem cells, more differentiated progenitor cells, and glioma stem cells. At this stage the increase in data generated from human samples will hopefully inform the creation of newer animal models that will recapitulate more accurately the diversity of gliomas and provide novel insights into the biologic mechanisms underlying tumor initiation and progression.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi91-vi91
Author(s):  
Carol Kruchko ◽  
Nirav Patil ◽  
Gino Cioffi ◽  
Daniel Brat ◽  
Janet Bruner ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) uses a histology grouping scheme modeled after the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System (CNS) to classify cancer registry records for clinically relevant statistical reporting. Molecular studies have identified genetic features which precisely stratify tumor types, resulting in the 2016 update to the WHO Classification incorporating these markers. To continue providing clinically relevant statistics, the histology groupings have been aligned with the 2016 update. Resulting changes to groupings were assessed. METHODS In collaboration with four consulting neuropathologists the scheme was reviewed and realigned to the 2016 update. Obsolete histology nomenclature and ICD-O-3 codes were identified. Evaluation of the frequency of affected codes in the 2013-2017 data was conducted. RESULTS 417,767 total cases of primary brain and CNS tumors were diagnosed during 2013-2017 in the US. After review of the CBTRUS grouping scheme, 67 codes were noted to be obsolete, 51 codes were re-classified and 12 new codes were incorporated. This reorganization could result in grouping assignment or reporting changes for 2,588 cases (0.6%). The histology groups most significantly affected were mesenchymal tumors and neuronal and mixed neuronal glial tumors. CONCLUSIONS The 2016 revision to WHO Classification has affected collection and reporting of CNS tumors. The CBTRUS data edits program is now undergoing revision, which will become the basis of reporting. Some histology-specific molecular markers require additional data to distinguish between cases. In collaboration with CBTRUS, the NAACCR SSDI Committee developed a new variable for collection of molecular information. This variable was included in Uniform Data Standards beginning on January 1, 2018 and will be available for reporting in 2021. A 2021 update to the WHO Classification is scheduled for release later this year, requiring further classification updates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document