scholarly journals Interpreting GPFCSP within the LΠ ½ logic framework

Filomat ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-897
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Takaci ◽  
Aleksandar Perovic ◽  
Aleksandar Jovanovic

The aim of this paper is to interpret Generalized Priority Constraint Satisfaction Problem (GPFCSP) using the interpretational method. We will interpret the L? ? logic into the first order theory of the reals, in order to obtain alternative, simple-complete axiomatization of L? ? logic. A complete axiomatization using the interpretation method as a syntactical approach is given.

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Perovic ◽  
Nedeljko Stefanovic ◽  
Milos Milosevic ◽  
Dejan Ilic

Our main goal is to describe a potential usage of the interpretation method (i.e. formal representation of one first order theory into another) together with quantifier elimination procedures developed in the GIS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Bodirsky ◽  
Bertalan Bodor

Abstract Let K exp + \mathcal{K}_{{\operatorname{exp}}{+}} be the class of all structures 𝔄 such that the automorphism group of 𝔄 has at most c ⁢ n d ⁢ n cn^{dn} orbits in its componentwise action on the set of 𝑛-tuples with pairwise distinct entries, for some constants c , d c,d with d < 1 d<1 . We show that K exp + \mathcal{K}_{{\operatorname{exp}}{+}} is precisely the class of finite covers of first-order reducts of unary structures, and also that K exp + \mathcal{K}_{{\operatorname{exp}}{+}} is precisely the class of first-order reducts of finite covers of unary structures. It follows that the class of first-order reducts of finite covers of unary structures is closed under taking model companions and model-complete cores, which is an important property when studying the constraint satisfaction problem for structures from K exp + \mathcal{K}_{{\operatorname{exp}}{+}} . We also show that Thomas’ conjecture holds for K exp + \mathcal{K}_{{\operatorname{exp}}{+}} : all structures in K exp + \mathcal{K}_{{\operatorname{exp}}{+}} have finitely many first-order reducts up to first-order interdefinability.


Computability ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 347-358
Author(s):  
Matthew Harrison-Trainor

2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Franek ◽  
Stefan Ratschan ◽  
Piotr Zgliczynski

1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 626-636
Author(s):  
John T. Baldwin

AbstractLet T be a complete countable first order theory and λ an uncountable cardinal. Theorem 1. If T is not superstable, T has 2λ resplendent models of power λ. Theorem 2. If T is strictly superstable, then T has at least min(2λ, ℶ2) resplendent models of power λ. Theorem 3. If T is not superstable or is small and strictly superstable, then every resplendent homogeneous model of T is saturated. Theorem 4 (with Knight). For each μ ∈ ω ∪ {ω, 2ω} there is a recursive theory in a finite language which has μ resplendent models of power κ for every infinite κ.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document