scholarly journals Adjunctive therapy with brinzolamide in patients on travoprost treatment

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 310-314
Author(s):  
Nikola Babic ◽  
Veljko Andreic ◽  
Aleksandar Miljkovic ◽  
Vladimir Canadanovic ◽  
Sava Barisic

Introduction. This study was aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1% suspension (Azopt? 1%) and travoprost 0.004% (Travatan?) combined therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are in need of additional intraocular pressure lowering. Material and methods. This is a prospective, three-month, open-label, clinical study. Forty patients (80 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension on Travatan? treatment and with unsatis-factory results in lowering intraocular pressure were included in the study. The qualifying intraocular pressure on previous treatment with Travatan? (at least 6 weeks) was 22-36 mmHg in at least one eye at 8 a.m. intraocular pressure measurements at three eligibility visits. The patients received brinzolamide 1% twice a day in addition to travoprost 0.004% given once a day in the evening for 3 months. The follow-up examinations assessing the safety and efficacy of combined therapy of brinzolamide 1% and travoprost 0.004% were performed after 1 and 3 months. Results. Adjunctive therapy with brinzolamide resulted in statistically significant reductions in intraocular pressure from the travoprost baseline at all visits. Treatment with brinzolamide/travoprost caused statistically significant sustained reduction in intraocular pressure with the reduction of 17.39% (p<0.001) after 4 weeks and 20.08% (p<0.001) after 12 weeks. The intraocular pressure change from the baseline ranged from -3.9 mmHg after 4 weeks to -4.48 mmHg after 12 weeks. The most frequently related adverse effect was abnormal taste and blurred vision. Conclusion. Brinzolamide 1% (b.i.d.) used adjunctively with travoprost 0.004% (q.d.) lowers intraocular pressure significantly compared to travoprost alone. Both drugs were well tolerated and safe in the studied patients.

Author(s):  
Panos Theodosiadis ◽  
Anastasios Konstas ◽  
Ioannis Halkiadakis ◽  
Vasiliki Dimera ◽  
Dimitrios Koufakis ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was to test the non-inferiority of preservative-free (PF) latanoprost 50 μg/mL multi-dose ophthalmic solution versus the marketed benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved latanoprost 50 μg/mL ophthalmic solution in patients with open-angle glaucoma and patients with ocular hypertension. Methods: This was a prospective, national, randomized, multi-center, observer-blind, parallel-group controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive either PF or BAK-preserved latanoprost once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 8:00 AM in the affected eye between the end of the treatment (week 12) and the baseline (week 0). Secondary measurements were taken at weeks 2 and 6, with IOP being recorded at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 4:00 PM. Results: A total of 158 patients were included in the per protocol (PP) population (77 in the PF latanoprost treatment arm and 81 patients in the BAK-preserved latanoprost treatment arm). PF latanoprost was non-inferior to BAK-preserved latanoprost in reducing IOP at 8:00 AM in the study eye from the baseline (week 0) to the end of the treatment (week 12). The point estimate of the between-treatment difference was 0.1 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -0.646, 0.847). Mean between-group differences in IOP reduction from the baseline to each of the secondary measurements were also similar between the two treatment arms. The two treatments were well tolerated and had comparable adverse event profiles. Conclusions: PF latanoprost was non-inferior to BAK-preserved latanoprost in reducing IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Both treatments were well tolerated.


2011 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 438-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominick L Opitz ◽  
Sherman Tung ◽  
Unsun Sarah Jang ◽  
Jenny J Park

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document