Zenaida asiatica: BirdLife International

Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Schwertner ◽  
H. A. Mathewson ◽  
J. A. Roberson ◽  
G. L. Waggerman
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Schwertner ◽  
H. A. Mathewson ◽  
J. A. Roberson ◽  
M. Small ◽  
G. L. Waggerman
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Grimes ◽  
Michael F. Small ◽  
Lewanne L. French ◽  
Loyd W. Sneed ◽  
Arthur A. Andersen
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Small ◽  
Joseph A. Veech ◽  
John T. Baccus

Abstract Surveying bird populations through visual observation is generally limited to morning. The focus on morning surveys is based on the reasonable assumption that detection is more likely when birds are most active. However, population surveys could become more time- and cost-efficient if both morning and evening sampling were equally effective, particularly for game birds, such as white-winged dove Zenaida asiatica. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has recently implemented distance sampling to estimate population sizes and monitor an ongoing range expansion of this species. We compared morning vs. evening density estimates for white-winged doves sampled in Mason, Texas, on six separate occasions during summer 2006. Program DISTANCE (version 5.0) calculated similar detection probabilities and density estimates between paired morning and evening sampling periods. Probability of detection ranged from 0.27 to 0.46 for both morning and evening samples. Densities, in individuals/ha, ranged from 2.54 to 4.02 for morning sampling and 2.48 to 4.31 for evening sampling. In addition, variables (number of observations, cluster size, distance to cluster) used by DISTANCE did not vary substantially between morning and evening surveys. Our results suggest evening surveys are as effective as the conventional protocol of surveying white-winged doves only in the morning. Additional studies, using Program DISTANCE, should be conducted to similarly evaluate other species.


The Condor ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 864-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin P. Johnson ◽  
Dale H. Clayton

AbstractWe reconstructed a phylogeny for the seven species of doves in the genus Zenaida on the basis of a combined analysis of mitochondrial (ND2 and cytochrome b) and nuclear (fibrinogen intron 7) DNA sequences. This phylogeny, which is completely resolved, is well supported with all nodes showing greater than 50% bootstrap support. There was no significant conflict between trees based on each gene independently, although trees produced from fibrinogen intron 7 did not resolve relationships among five of the Zenaida species. The species status of Z. graysoni, as well as that of Z. meloda, is suggested based on their divergence from sister taxa (about 1% and 4%, respectively) and other differences. Zenaida can be divided into two major groups: Zenaida asiatica and Z. meloda versus Z. aurita, Z. galapagoensis, Z. auriculata, Z. graysoni, and Z. macroura.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Olin ◽  
S. M. Alcorn ◽  
J. M. Alcorn
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fructuoso Ayala-Guerrero ◽  
Irene Vasconcelos-Dueñas
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason W. Glass ◽  
Alan M. Fedynich ◽  
Michael F. Small ◽  
Steve J. Benn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document