Agricultural Productive and Consumptive Use Components of Rural Land Values in Texas: Comment

1987 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-178
Author(s):  
Rangesan Narayanan ◽  
Ronald L. Shane
1978 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale Colyer

Land values have tended to increase at a substantially more rapid rate than the general level of prices in recent years. There is a growing body of evidence that this is occurring due, in part, to factors other than agricultural opportunity costs, size of parcel, improvements and other factors historically related to land values (Bishop, Bryant, Pasour). Some other factors influencing rural land values seem to include urbanization, investment or speculation, and increasing wealth or incomes. Additional information on the determinants of land values is needed if these phenomena are to be more completely understood. This paper reports on a study of the relationships of socio-economic characteristic of land owners (buyers and sellers) and rural land values.


2021 ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Peter L. Nuthall

Abstract This chapter discusses investments and capital of the farmers. Anne mused on the chance of buying land at the right time to make good capital gains (post-inflationary impacts had been removed of course). Search the web for information on local rural land values, all in the more or less same environment so the values are not confounded by land quality, and also search for information on local inflation rates. Inflate the land values by the inflation rates cumulatively to create a series comparable with today's land values. The chapter finishes on thoughts on the ethics of trying to change farmers'attitudes and approaches.


1981 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod F. Ziemer ◽  
Fred C. White

The market for farmland has often been a subject of interest to agricultural economists, as evidenced by numerous studies that have investigated factors determining rural land values (Aines; Reynolds and Timmons; Ruttan; Sco-field). Despite the wealth of literature concerned with land values, little is known about who owns and exercises entrepreneurial control over land resources in the U.S. Consequently, there is a lack of understanding concerning the decision to purchase farmland. Lewis has suggested that better understanding of landowner investment decisions is important in determining and implementing effective land-use policy. Also, Wunderlich has noted the importance of understanding land ownership with regard to land-use decisions. Long et al. (p. 44) have suggested that “if policies are to be designed to influence private landowners’ decisions, then it seems imperative that the factors affecting landowners’ decisions and the decision process be better understood.”


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-249
Author(s):  
Jessica Wilczak

Since the late 1990s, rural residential land consolidation projects have propelled a wave of rural restructuring across China. Characterized by the creation of concentrated villages, land consolidation is seen as a means of both improving land-use efficiency and promoting rural development. But residential concentration is often funded through the commodification of rural land – a trend that became particularly clear in rural Chengdu after the Wenchuan earthquake. This article explores the implications of land-based rural reconstruction in Chengdu. Drawing on a comparison of three adjacent communities in peri-urban Chengdu, the article argues that the tactics adopted by local leaders in their efforts to generate funds through land consolidation can best be characterized as a process of leveraging rural land values. This leveraging entails not only a risk of failure, but also a diversion of public funds towards projects that enhance the attractiveness of land to urban investors, a removal of control over land from the hands of rural residents, and a deepening of inequalities across communities.


1975 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-83
Author(s):  
H. Evan Drummond

Public opinion surveys indicate that the local property tax is the least popular of all taxes paid by Americans, yet in almost every state such a tax is levied for the support of local government and/or public schools. The major economic argument against the property tax is its inequities — both vertical and horizontal. Several studies have focused on the vertical equity of property taxes in Oklahoma, but the question of horizontal equity remains unexplored. The research reported in this paper deals with the nature of horizontal inequities in the taxation of rural land in Oklahoma and with the impact of state-wide equalization on rural land values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document