Constitutional Law. Substantive Due Process. Fifth Circuit Rejects Section 1983 "State-Created Danger" Claim of Plaintiff Shot by an Undercover Informant Using a Gun on "Loan" from a City Police Officer. McClendon v. City of Columbia, 305 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc), Cert. Denied, 71 U. S. L. W. 3416 (U. S. Mar. 3, 2003) (No. 02-861)

2003 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 1912
Keyword(s):  
Police Officer ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Substantive Due Process ◽  
City Police

Part VII Rights—Substance and Content, Ch.43 Due Process

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandrachud Abhinav
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Pure Form ◽  
Indian Constitution ◽  
Constituent Assembly ◽  
Procedural Due Process ◽  
Due Process Of Law ◽  
Substantive Due Process

This chapter examines the guarantee of ‘due process of law’ in the Indian Constitution. After providing an account of Constituent Assembly Debates and the historical intent behind this guarantee, the Chapter explores how substantive due process came to become a part of Indian constitutional law. Through a reading of important cases, it demonstrates the shift from substantive due process to procedural due process before turning to a third kind of due process presently seen in Indian constitutional law that is distinct from these two standard forms. It examines this third form of ‘pure form’ due process, as well as provides some reflections upon the concepts of arbitrariness and reasonableness and their relationship with this guarantee.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document