The Quality of Life in the German Democratic Republic: Changes and Developments in a State Socialist Society

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Davis Daycock ◽  
Marilyn Rueschemeyer ◽  
Christiane Lemke
1981 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-91
Author(s):  
Günther Krusche

The main characteristic of the place and part held by Protes tant churches in the German Democratic Republic lies in the change from a popular and state church status to that of a mino rity church and even of «diaspora». Having mentioned the diffe rent transition and adaptation phases theses churches went throught after the second world war - denazification, anticlerical struggles challenges from Marxist ideology, the founding of the Federation of Protestant Churches in the G.D.R. - the author goes on to explain what understanding this Church has of itself today, the areas that still remain controversial, and finally, the tasks that it has set itself in a socialist society.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-460
Author(s):  
Richard Millington

Abstract Friedrich Engels claimed that the removal of the perceived causes of crime in a society—capitalist economic and societal conditions—would automatically lead to the eradication of crime. This did not prove to be the case in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), where instances of everyday criminality such as theft, robbery and assault never fell below 100,000 per annum throughout the period of the state’s existence, from 1949 to 1989. This article examines the ruling Socialist Unity Party’s (SED) perceptions of the causes of everyday criminality in the GDR. It shows that the SED concluded that crime persisted because citizens’ ‘socialist sense of legal right and wrong’ (sozialistisches Rechtsbewußtsein) was underdeveloped. The regime measured this by the extent to which citizens supported and participated in socialist society. Thus, crime could be eliminated by co-opting as many citizens as possible into the Party’s political project. The SED’s ideological tunnel vision on the causes of everyday criminality meant that it dismissed hints about the real causes of crime, such as poor supply and living conditions, identified by its analysts. Its failure to address these issues meant that citizens continued to break the law. Thus, the Party’s exercise of power contributed to the creation of limits to that power. Moreover, analysis of opinion polls on GDR citizens’ attitudes to criminality shows that they accepted crime as a part of everyday life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document