Essays on International & Comparative Law: In Honour of Judge Erades. Presented by The Board of the Netherlands International Law Review. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Instituut; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983. Pp. xi, 273. Dfl.95; $41.50.

1985 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 468-470
Author(s):  
John N. Hazard
1989 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-269

In April of this year the 12th Telders International Law Moot Court Competition was held in the Peace Palace in the Hague. Teams from twelve European countries debated the issues concerning the “Right to Insurgency Case”, which was included in the last issue of the Leiden Journal of International Law. The winner of the 1989 Competition was the Team from the University of Leiden, the Netherlands. In the final round they took on the team from Germany, in the Great Hall of Justice at the Peace Palace, in front of Judge Jose Maria Ruda, Judge Manfred Lachs and Judge Sir Robert Jennings.


Author(s):  
C. H. Alexandrowicz

It is generally believed that commercial treaties between European and Asian powers prior to the nineteenth century focused on the establishments and privileges of European traders in Asia. However, there are exceptions where establishments of Asian traders in Europe received the same type of benefits as those enjoyed by European traders in Asia. This chapter focuses on one example, a treaty concluded on 7 February 1631 at The Hague between the King of Persia and the States General of the United Provinces of the Netherlands in which the latter, in return for privileges accorded to the Dutch in Persia, conceded reciprocal benefits to Persian traders in the Netherlands. In terms of international law, the treaty secured national treatment to Persians, granting them the same franchises and rights as those enjoyed by the inhabitants of the Netherlands, even by persons of quality in high positions whenever they engaged in trade.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document