Cognitive Consistency, Response Reinforcement, and Attitude Change

Sociometry ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Scott
Author(s):  
Richard R. Lau

Persuasion is an active, intentional attempt to change nonverifiable evaluations, feeling, values, norms, and related behaviors. Historically, there have been two major programs of attitude change research in social psychology, one a learning theory approach associated with Carl Hovland, the second a cognitive consistency approach associated with Gestalt psychology and the research of Fritz Heider and the many students of Kurt Lewin. More recently, dual process theories of attitude change point to two different paths by which persuasion can occur, one a central route based on a relatively deep, systematic, conscious processing of the arguments in a persuasive message; the second a peripheral route based on more shallow, heuristic, and sometimes almost automatic processing of a persuasive message. Attitudes are frequently an important—but rarely the only—determinant of behavior; and behavior, sometimes, can be an important determinant of attitudes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 992-1021
Author(s):  
Craig M. Rawlings

Are individuals’ attitudes constrained such that it is difficult to change one attitude without also changing other attitudes? Given a lack of longitudinal studies in real-world settings, it remains unclear if individuals have coherent attitude systems at all—and, if they do, what produces attitude constraint. I argue and show that groups can endogenously produce attitude constraint via cognitive authorities. Within groups, cognitive authorities explicitly link attitudes and generate feelings of connectedness among members, thereby facilitating the interpersonal processing of attitudes. Using data on interpersonal sentiment relations and attitude changes among members of intentional communities, I find cognitive authorities constrain attitudes via two mechanisms: (1) interpersonal tensions when attitudes and sentiment relations are misaligned (i.e., balance dynamics), and (2) social influence processes leading to attitude changes that are concordant with the group’s attitude system (i.e., constraint satisfaction). These findings imply that attitude change models based exclusively on interpersonal contagion or individual drives for cognitive consistency overlook important ways group structures affect how individuals feel and think.


1974 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 634-634
Author(s):  
ELLEN BERSCHEID
Keyword(s):  

1971 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
EBBE B. EBBESEN
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
HAROLD B. PEPINSKY
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document