Family Relationships in Shakespeare and the Restoration Comedy of Manners.

1986 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
James J. Stathis ◽  
Sarup Singh
PMLA ◽  
1915 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Edward Chauncey Baldwin

Every reader of the Restoration comedy of manners cannot fail to be impressed with the frequent occurrence of the character-sketch. Often this is of a typical personage having no part in the action, as when in Wycherley's Plain Dealer, Novel and Olivia together in dialogue form describe Lady Autumn, her daughter, and a fop, none of whom appears in the play. Again, one notices a marked use of the dramatic convention of making one actor describe another who is about to enter. A typical instance occurs in the scene just mentioned when Novel describes in the form of a “character,” Lord Plausible, and is interrupted by that gentleman's entrance.


1955 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Berkeley

PMLA ◽  
1956 ◽  
Vol 71 (4-Part-1) ◽  
pp. 694-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Schiller

Evocation of the spirit of a former age is one of the surest ways to demonstrate that the past can never be the present. Sheridan, in writing The School for Scandal, made an excursion into the Restoration, an act of literary nostalgia, and a recognition, perhaps, that he had been born a century too late. His purpose was clear: to write a neo-Restoration high comedy of manners. That he achieved it outwardly is certain. That he succeeded in resurrecting the spirit is a question—one which raises still another question: wherein lies the “spirit” of Restoration comedy?


1949 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
V. de S. Pinto ◽  
Elisabeth Mignon ◽  
Erwin Weide

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Murgatroyd ◽  
Brian Cade ◽  
Michael Shooter
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Cook

Abstract. In family systems, it is possible for one to put oneself at risk by eliciting aversive, high-risk behaviors from others ( Cook, Kenny, & Goldstein, 1991 ). Consequently, it is desirable that family assessments should clarify the direction of effects when evaluating family dynamics. In this paper a new method of family assessment will be presented that identifies bidirectional influence processes in family relationships. Based on the Social Relations Model (SRM: Kenny & La Voie, 1984 ), the SRM Family Assessment provides information about the give and take of family dynamics at three levels of analysis: group, individual, and dyad. The method will be briefly illustrated by the assessment of a family from the PIER Program, a randomized clinical trial of an intervention to prevent the onset of psychosis in high-risk young people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document