AMERICA IN “THE AMERICAN SCHOLAR”

2021 ◽  
pp. 21-31
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 120-139
Author(s):  
T. N. Belova

Foreign trade policy and its role in the economic growth of the national economy are considered through the prism of history and comparison of the formation of the industrial economy in the Russian Empire and the North American United States. The author compares the protectionism of D. I. Mendeleev, described in his economic works, and the free trade thinking of the American scholar W. Sumner, who formulated the “misconceptions” of protectionism. Mendeleev’s proper protectionism is grounded on the basic principles (incentivizing internal competition, growth of consumption, bringing up of new industries ), which are relevant for contemporary Russia. The author gives a typical example of the formation and decline of the factory industry using the case of mirror factories in the Ryazan province. These historical analogies, the paper argues, are necessary for the correct assessment of the current situation and for coming up with valid solutions aimed at the development of the Russian economy.


1957 ◽  
Vol 89 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 79-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hiskett
Keyword(s):  

The contents of the Kano Chronicle have long been known to scholars from the translation by Sir Richmond Palmer. The several Arabic MSS. of the work had, for years, been lost sight of, though it was thought that there must still be copies in Kano. In 1939 an American scholar, Professor J. H. Greenberg, made a microfilm copy of a MS. which he found there. This copy can apparently no longer be traced.


1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-175
Author(s):  
Felix Rohatyn

The United States ambassador to France I am pleased and honored to be here today to present the Tocqueville Prize to the distinguished American Scholar, Daniel Bell.


1943 ◽  
Vol 33 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Charlesworth

In dealing with so wide-ranging a subject, a remark of an American scholar, Mr. Hoey, on the intimate connection between the titles pius, felix, and invictus provides a convenient starting-point.The first observation I would make is to call your attention to the consecutive (and almost causal) connection of these adjectives : because the Emperor is pius the gods will render him felix (for felicitas is their gift to their favourites) and his felicitas is best demonstrated in his being invictus. Nearly every nation of antiquity believed and hoped that its gods would bring it success : the Roman People, with seven centuries of expansion and increasing power to look back on, were convinced that their scrupulous attention to the due performance of the proper rites had won them this success, that their pietas had secured to them victoria; if the Emperor could be termed pius felix invictus, it was because he summed up and incarnated there the Roman People.


1957 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-75
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Whittaker
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document