Corporate Governance in Transitional Economies:

Author(s):  
Yoshiro Miwa ◽  
J. Mark Ramseyer
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna L. Y Ho ◽  
Xiongsheng Yang ◽  
Xiang Li

ABSTRACT Governments in transitional economies have long been concerned with whether privatization of state-owned enterprises can improve firm performance and, if so, through which mechanisms this can be achieved. Using 135 publicly listed firms that China privatized via control transfer from 1998 to 2005 as a sample, we investigate whether newly privatized firms enhance incentives of top management and employees and, consequently, whether post-privatization firm performance is improved. Our findings reveal several post-privatization effects: (1) a much lower level of large shareholder expropriation, (2) higher and more performance-sensitive executive compensation, and (3) lower levels of management perk consumption and employment, which increase more slowly when sales grow and decrease more quickly when sales shrink. These enhancements in incentives help explain post-privatization firm performance improvement. JEL Classifications: G34; M48.


2005 ◽  
pp. 121-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Erznkian

Problems of verification of Coase theorem in general and in connection with post-socialist privatization and corporate governance in particular are considered in this article. The author discusses the position of W. Andreff presented in his paper (VE, 2001, No 12). The appeal to this theorem is actual because it has been used as the justification of post-socialist economies' privatization methods. Orthodox and heterodox views on privatization and corporate governance are explored. The author analyzes the reasons of reform failures in transitional economies and the ways of emerging markets development basing on two different models - oriented on stock market or banking activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document