Determinants of Executive Compensation

The object of this research focuses on executive compensation, which is a form of appreciation for the agent’s contribution as the party responsible for the company performance and the improvement of the walfare of the principals. The aims of this study is to determine the effect of profitability and leverage on executive compensation in non financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2017 – 2019. Population of this study is non financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2017 – 2019 with a sample by non financial listed in Kompas100 index to represent the existing population. Independent variables used in this study are profitability which is measured by return on assets (ROA) and leverage which is measured by debt to equity ratio (DER). Dependent variable used in this study is executive compensation which is measured by total remuneration of president director. This study also used control variables such as executive age, executive gender and executive tenure. The sampling method of this study is a purposive sampling. The research model used is panel data with fixed effect model approach. The findings have shown that profitability has a negative significant effect on executive compensation. It is also noted that the lower level of the company’s debt, the larger the amount of executive compensation. These findings shed the light on research on agency theory that compensation on performance is not valid in Indonesia.

REFLECTIONS OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON PAY-PERFORMANCE SENSITIVITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE

ABSTRACT Purpose: This research investigates whether the characteristics of corporate governance (executive compensation, board composition, ownership structure, and control) influence the sensitivity of remuneration to firms’ performance, the so-called pay-performance sensitivity. Originality/value: This study brings to the literature a new perspective on the interaction of corporate governance mechanisms aligned with the concept of pay-performance sensitivity. The study shows that governance instruments are not isolated but rather interrelated and interdependent. Design/methodology/approach: The study sample was composed of Brazil 100 Index (IBRX 100) companies listed on B3 from 2014 to 2018. Data were extracted from the Economatica® database, and the reference forms were accessed on the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil’s (CVM) website. We use panel data regression models with fixed and random-effects models. Findings: The board composition (represented by the CEO/Chairman duality) increases the pay-performance sensitivity, while the ownership concentration reduces it. In addition, a greater presence of independent members on the board reduces the variation in executive compensation.

Toward a Family Science Perspective on Executive Compensation in Family Firms: A Review and Research Agenda

In family firms, the family often plays a central role in the strategic decisions of the business. However, until recently, research has primarily focused on exploring the role that business factors play in firm decision-making, with less attention given to the role of the family system. This article reviews the research on executive compensation in family firms to understand whether and how the family system has been considered within this work. Guided by the application of family science theories, we provide a framework to explain why it is important to incorporate the family system in the future study of executive compensation in family firms. We conclude by discussing a research agenda outlining how elements of the family system can be integrated into future executive compensation research to inspire scholars to think differently about this important research topic.

THE EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, PROFITABILITY, LEVERAGE, CAPITAL INTENSITY AND COMPANY AGE ON TAX AVOIDANCE

The purpose of this reasearch is to find the effect of executives compensation, profitability, leverage, capital intensity and age against tax avoidance. Population in this reasearch is the company LQ45 index in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2017-2020. The method of determining the sample used in this reasearch was purposive sampling. Total sample used in this reasearch is 120 financial report from 30 company. The Hypothesis in this research was tested using multiple regresion analysis. The results of the study found 1) executive compensation had a significant positive effect on tax avoidance (p = 0.000), 2) profitability had no significant effect on tax avoidance (p = 0.533), 3) leverage had no significant effect on tax avoidance (p = 0.341), 4 ) capital intensity has a significant positive effect on tax avoidance (p = 0.001), 5) company age has no significant effect on tax avoidance (p = 0.846).

Rhetoric Analysis on the Relationship between Executive Compensation and Performance of Commercial public enterprises in Namibia.

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the relationship between compensation packages and the performance of executive officers in Commercial Public Enterprises in Namibia. The paper was conducted to achieve the following specific objective: to determine the relationship between compensation packages of executives and the performance of Commercial PEs in Namibia. It was all in the context of mixed research approach for data collection using a questionnaire as a tool. The study found that there is a partial relationship between executive compensation and the performance of some commercial public enterprises, in accordance with their Tier Levels. It is recommended that the Government (shareholder) finds the best fit model of executive compensation packages in order to induce a positive level of performance. It is further recommended that a study be conducted, to investigate the relationship between the role of an independent high-level committee on executive compensation packages, aimed at enhancing performance in Commercial Public Enterprises in Namibia Keywords: Compensation Package; Performance; Commercial Public Enterprises; Executives

Effort, Idiosyncratic Risk and Investment Under Uncertainty

<p>This thesis is based upon four very simple premises: 1. managers, not shareholders make the investment decisions for the firm; 2. managers do more than just say "yes" or "no" to investments, they can also exert effort that affects the payoff from investment; 3. executive compensation schemes can cause managers to hold more stock than is optimal for diversification purposes; and 4. many investments can be delayed and involve irreversible capital costs as well as uncertain payoffs. Combining these four premises gives the two central questions this thesis attempts to answer: 1. How does the level of managerial stock-ownership affect the investment decisions managers make for the firm? and 2. given the answer to (1), how does this affect the shareholder's decision to hire a manager? In this thesis I use a continuous time "Real Options" framework to answer these questions. The form of the utility function assumed for the manager has a huge impact on the tractability of the modelling. The assumption of Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) utility as opposed to Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA) causes the manager's valuation of the cash flow (the very first step of the modelling) to become wealth dependent. This in itself is an interesting issue, but it also poses interesting numerical issues and makes the later steps of the analysis intractable. Because of this we split the substantive analysis of this thesis into two parts. In the first we assume CARA utility in order to remove wealth dependence from the valuation and obtain a "clean path" to the end goal of a dynamic model of hiring, effort and irreversible investment. In the second we focus on CRRA utility thus allowing the manager's valuation to depend on his financial wealth. We then explain the resultant numerical issues, and the appropriate approach to their solution.</p>

Effort, Idiosyncratic Risk and Investment Under Uncertainty

<p>This thesis is based upon four very simple premises: 1. managers, not shareholders make the investment decisions for the firm; 2. managers do more than just say "yes" or "no" to investments, they can also exert effort that affects the payoff from investment; 3. executive compensation schemes can cause managers to hold more stock than is optimal for diversification purposes; and 4. many investments can be delayed and involve irreversible capital costs as well as uncertain payoffs. Combining these four premises gives the two central questions this thesis attempts to answer: 1. How does the level of managerial stock-ownership affect the investment decisions managers make for the firm? and 2. given the answer to (1), how does this affect the shareholder's decision to hire a manager? In this thesis I use a continuous time "Real Options" framework to answer these questions. The form of the utility function assumed for the manager has a huge impact on the tractability of the modelling. The assumption of Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) utility as opposed to Constant Absolute Risk Aversion (CARA) causes the manager's valuation of the cash flow (the very first step of the modelling) to become wealth dependent. This in itself is an interesting issue, but it also poses interesting numerical issues and makes the later steps of the analysis intractable. Because of this we split the substantive analysis of this thesis into two parts. In the first we assume CARA utility in order to remove wealth dependence from the valuation and obtain a "clean path" to the end goal of a dynamic model of hiring, effort and irreversible investment. In the second we focus on CRRA utility thus allowing the manager's valuation to depend on his financial wealth. We then explain the resultant numerical issues, and the appropriate approach to their solution.</p>