Household Management—April 22, 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-60
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Sajeva ◽  
Andrew Mitchell ◽  
Mark Lemon

This article is based upon a heterodox approach to economics that rejects the oversimplification made by closed economic models and the mainstream concept of ‘externality.' This approach re-imagines economics as a holistic evaluation of resources versus human needs, which requires judgement based on understanding of the complexity generated by the dynamic relations between different systems. One re-imagining of the economic model is as a holistic and systemic evaluation of agri-food systems' sustainability that was performed through the multi-dimensional Governance Assessment Matrix Exercise (GAME). This is based on the five capitals model of sustainability, and the translation of qualitative evaluations into quantitative scores. This is based on the triangulation of big data from a variety of sources. To represent quantitative interactions, this article proposes a provisional translation of GAME's qualitative evaluation into a quantitative form through the identification of measurement units that can reflect the different capital dimensions. For instance, a post-normal, ecological accounting method, Emergy is proposed to evaluate the natural capital. The revised GAME re-imagines economics not as the ‘dismal science,' but as one that has potential leverage for positive, adaptive and sustainable ecosystemic analyses and global ‘household' management. This article proposes an explicit recognition of economics nested within the social spheres of human and social capital which are in turn nested within the ecological capital upon which all life rests and is truly the bottom line. In this article, the authors make reference to an on-line retailer of local food and drink to illustrate the methods for evaluation of the five capitals model.


2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Y. MacDonald

From the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s New Testament scholars produced groundbreaking work illustrating that the household code had its origins in discussions of ‘household management’ among philosophers and moralists from Aristotle onward. Despite this general consensus, many points of disagreement remained, especially with respect to the function of the codes in particular New Testament documents and what the codes reveal about the relationship of Christians with the wider world. This article revisits some of the initial debates and traces their influence on subsequent scholarship. The recognition of the household codes as a type of ‘political’ discourse is of particular interest, as well as its impact on subsequent feminist, political and postcolonial interpretation. The conclusion suggests five promising directions, closely tied to the study of early Christian families, for future analysis of the codes leading to a more complete understanding of household management in a house-church setting.


Author(s):  
Susan E. Hylen

This chapter provides evidence for the tasks and occupations of women in the New Testament period. Most women became mothers, and many were the managers of household resources. Women were involved in the economic productivity of their households, whether as managers of slaves and freedpeople or as laborers themselves—and, often, as both. They were often responsible for managing a child’s education and rearing alongside these other tasks. In addition, many women also worked in business or had various jobs, either as free or freedwomen or as slaves. They were less likely than men to hold high managerial posts or political offices. Nevertheless, they performed valuable labor. The chapter explores motherhood and household management, along with women’s jobs in business (production and retail) and entertainment. It also assesses similar evidence from the New Testament of women’s occupations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document