Utopian socialism

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-54
Keyword(s):  
1989 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Scott Arnold

Marx believed that what most clearly distinguished him and Engels from the nineteenth-century French socialists was that their version (or vision) of socialism was “scientific” while the latters' was Utopian. What he intended by this contrast is roughly the following: French socialists such as Proudhon and Fourier constructed elaborate visions of a future socialist society without an adequate understanding of existing capitalist society. For Marx, on the other hand, socialism was not an idea or an ideal to be realized, but a natural outgrowth of the existing capitalist order. Marx's historical materialism is a systematic attempt to discover the laws governing the inner dynamics of capitalism and class societies generally. Although this theory issues in a prediction of the ultimate triumph of socialism, it is a commonplace that Marx had little to say about the details of post-capitalist society. Nevertheless, some of its features can be discerned from his critical analysis of capitalism and what its replacement entails.


Hard Reading ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. 274-276
Author(s):  
Tom Shippey

This chapter opens with a study of Robert Heinlein, an author at once extremely patriotic and extremely critical, whose works often display a violent switch of direction: apparently because Heinlein’s core belief was that the American way, while often at fault, was inherently self-correcting. His work was carefully noted and built on by Kim Stanley Robinson, whose “Orange County” trilogy offers three views of a future America: apocalypse, dystopian capitalism, and utopian socialism. Two other works by Tom Disch and Geoff Ryman move the critique of America into the regions of fantasy and perhaps allegory. All the later works demonstrate science fiction’s increasing sophistication in terms of narrative structure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 156-187
Author(s):  
Mark A. Allison

This chapter demonstrates that George Eliot’s investigation of the early, “utopian” socialists catalyzed the writing of perhaps the most iconic of all Victorian novels, Middlemarch (1871–2). The utopian socialists (as Robert Owen, Charles Fourier, Henri de Saint-Simon, and their followers were increasingly known) frequently suggested that the transition to a new, nongovernmental social order hinged upon the emancipation of women. Their untimely calls for female liberation became newly salient with the coalescence, in the 1860s, of Britain’s first national campaign for women’s suffrage. This chapter’s reading of Middlemarch shows that socialist discourse provides Eliot a rich symbolic vocabulary with which to conduct her own novelistic investigation of the “Woman Question”—and to engage in a clandestine meditation on the claims of the suffragists. By incorporating socialist elements into her novel, Eliot could unobtrusively position herself in relation to the ideals and activities of this burgeoning movement—a movement in which a number of her closest friends were involved. Attending to Middlemarch’s socialist motif demystifies the novel’s shrouded origins and decodes a hitherto illegible record of Eliot’s proto-feminist aspirations which, like the early socialists’ own, were inextricably intertwined with skepticism about institutional politics. This chapter also provides a genealogy of “utopian socialism,” a category that has exerted a distorting influence on scholarship since Marx and Engels tarred their rivals with it in The Communist Manifesto.


1939 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Manning Hawthorne
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Duarte Oliveira Venancio

O presente artigo deseja mostrar que, para os principais autores do Socialismo Utópico, o conceito de massa é o princípio de organização para a sociedade politicamente desejada. Através da análise comparativa entre as ideias de Conde de Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier e Robert Owen, é possível notar que, para essa corrente de pensamento, a massa existe aqui ora como representante da forma social que os pobres devem estar para buscar sua emancipação social, ora como encarnação simbólica da cooperação, a verdadeira sabedoria social tal como é bem sintetizado pelo pensamento oweniano.


Mercator ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-167
Author(s):  
Miriam Hermi Zaar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document