The Place of the Sublime in Kant’s Aesthetic Theory

2018 ◽  
pp. 161-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
DONALD W. CRAWFORD
Keyword(s):  
1959 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Samuel Holt Monk ◽  
Walter John Hipple

1960 ◽  
Vol 10 (39) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Ronald W. Hepburn ◽  
W. J. Hipple

1959 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Perry Miller ◽  
Walter John Hipple

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (08) ◽  
pp. 104-107
Author(s):  
Feruza Bozarova ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Books Abroad ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
B. A. Park ◽  
Walter John Hipple,

Author(s):  
Gloria Bell

This paper examines the philosophical concept of the sublime and its impact in the work of the artist Giovanni Battista Piranesi. The main focus of the paper is Piranesi’s Carceri series, created during the period of 1740 – 1760 in Rome. Although Dionysius Longinus wrote of the sublime several centuries earlier, this concept became popular in 18th century aesthetic theory, and Piranesi had access to the writings of Longinus and 18th-century followers of his ideas. According to Longinus’ theory, creating a sublime work of art required daring and great thinking. The sublime was a quality of experience meant to move the soul to a higher realm. Piranesi attempted to emulate this quality in his own works by invoking the grandeur of ancient Rome. Piranesi was surrounded by ancient ruins and he was actively involved in archaeological digs. He wrote on the wonder of observing the ruins of Rome, “these speaking ruins have filled my spirit”. At the same time, Piranesi was not only surrounded by classical concepts; the motif of the gothic arch, which conveys the idea of architecture reaching up to heaven, also plays a role in his prints and their evocation of the sublime. His techniques with etching, composition, and depiction of light show his creativity, skill, and ambition, consistent with Longinus’ ideas. The iconography of the Carceri prints, especially Plates XIII, XIV, XVI, expresses Piranesi’s interest in the sublime through imaginative compositions, relating tiny figures to lofty architectural spaces, and through his demonstrated pride in ancient Rome.


1958 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Alexander Sesonske ◽  
Walter John Hipple

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan A. Ortlieb ◽  
Uwe C. Fischer ◽  
Claus-Christian Carbon

In his ground-breaking Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, Edmund Burke (1757) presented a comprehensive aesthetic theory based on two types of aesthetic appreciation: the beautiful and the sublime. While beauty inspires us with tender feelings of affection, a thrill of delightful horror attracts us to the sublime. According to Burke these ideas originate in a drive for affiliation (beautiful) and a drive for self-preservation (sublime). He also claims that the sublime is generally the more powerful aesthetic experience. A synopsis of literature on gender differences in aesthetic preferences, personality traits, and social motivation suggests, however, that on average women might be less susceptible to the Burkeian sublime than men. We tested this hypothesis empirically using sixty picture details from a triptych by Hieronymus Bosch. One hundred and fifty participants rated these stimuli in terms of threat (respectively safety) and liking. Besides, they completed standardized scales for state and trait anxiety as well as for state and trait depression. We found a strong effect for gender: on average, safety and liking were more closely related for female than for male participants. In the light of these findings we state that Burke’s concepts of the beautiful and the sublime might in fact be confounded with gender-related aesthetic preferences and that his proclivity to the sublime could reflect a male gaze on aesthetics. Finally, we discuss possible indicators for ‘Burke’s fallacy’ in empirical aesthetics today.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document