Basic Management of Pelvic Fractures

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Simpson ◽  
Raul Coimbra ◽  
Todd W Costantini

The management and treatment of complex pelvic fractures require knowledge of the initial evaluation of a trauma patient, pertinent anatomy, and techniques available for hemorrhage control. Trauma patients with complex pelvic fractures are at high risk for hemorrhage and require thoughtful and expeditious management. A multidisciplinary team including a trauma surgeon, an orthopedic surgeon, and an interventional radiologist is required for optimal treatment of these complex injuries. The team must be managed by the trauma surgeon to guide ongoing resuscitation as the patient may travel throughout the hospital to undergo several interventions to control hemorrhage. A number of techniques can be emergently implemented for fracture stabilization and hemorrhage control, including temporary application of a pelvic binder, preperitoneal pelvic packing, external fixation, and angioembolization. The patient’s clinical status, fracture pattern, and bleeding source must be considered when deciding which hemorrhage control techniques should be performed. New temporary hemorrhage control interventions, such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, have shown early success in control of pelvic fracture–related hemorrhage and require further investigation. Pelvic fractures are associated with a number of neurovascular and genitourinary injuries, which can carry long-term morbidity. This review discusses the diagnosis, management, and treatment of complex pelvic fracture and associated hemorrhage. This review contains 5 figures, and 55 references.  Key words: angioembolization, pelvic fixation, pelvic fracture, preperitoneal packing, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 357-370
Author(s):  
Chak Wah Kam ◽  
Ping Keung Joe Law ◽  
Hon Wai Jacky Lau ◽  
Rashidi Ahmad ◽  
Chiu Lun Joseph Tse ◽  
...  

Background: Unstable pelvic fractures are highly lethal injuries. Objective: The review aims to summarize the landmark management changes in the past two decades. Methods: Structured review based on pertinent published literatures on severe pelvic fracture was performed. Results: Ten key management points were identified. Conclusion: These 10 recommendations help diminish and prevent the mortality. (1) Before the ABCDE management, preparedness, protection, and decision are essential to optimize patient outcome and to conserve resources. (2) Do not rock the pelvis to check stability, avoid logrolling but prophylactic pelvic binder can be life-saving. (3) Computed tomography scanner can be the tunnel to death for hemodynamically unstable patients. (4) Correct application of pelvic binder at the greater trochanter level to achieve the most effective compression. (5) Choose the suitable binder (BEST does not exist, always look for BETTER) to facilitate body examination and therapeutic intervention. (6) Massive transfusion protocol is only a temporizing measure to sustain the circulation for life maintenance. (7) Damage control operation aims to promptly stop the bleeding to restore the physiology by combating the trauma lethal triad to be followed by definitive anatomical repair. (8) Protocol-driven teamwork management expedites the completion of the multi-phase therapy including external pelvic fixation, pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, and angio-embolization, preceded by laparotomy when indicated. (9) Resuscitation endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta can reduce the pelvic bleeding while awaiting hospital transfer or operation theater access. (10) Operation is the definitive therapy for trauma but prevention is the best treatment, comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary levels.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Jarvis ◽  
Michael Kelly ◽  
Charles Mains ◽  
Chad Corrigan ◽  
Nimesh Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is not widely adopted for pelvic fracture management. Western Trauma Association recommends REBOA for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures, whereas Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Advanced Trauma Life Support do not. Method Utilizing a prospective cross-sectional survey, all 158 trauma medical directors at American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma centers were emailed survey invitations. The study aimed to determine the rate of REBOA use, REBOA indicators, and the treatment sequence of REBOA for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Results Of those invited, 25% (40/158) participated and 90% (36/40) completed the survey. Nearly half of trauma centers [42% (15/36)] use REBOA for pelvic fracture management. All participants included hemodynamic instability as an indicator for REBOA placement in pelvic fractures. In addition to hemodynamic instability, 29% (4/14) stated REBOA is used for patients who are ineligible for angioembolization, 14% (2/14) use REBOA when interventional radiology is unavailable, 7% (1/14) use REBOA for patients with a negative FAST. Fifty percent (7/14) responded that hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures exclusively indicates REBOA placement. Hemodynamic instability for pelvic fractures was most commonly defined as systolic blood pressure of < 90 [56% (20/36)]. At centers using REBOA, REBOA was the first line of treatment for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures 40% (6/15) of the time. Conclusions There is little consensus on REBOA use for pelvic fractures at US Level I Trauma Centers, except that hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures consistently indicated REBOA use.


2020 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2020-001469
Author(s):  
William Parker ◽  
R W Despain ◽  
J Bailey ◽  
E Elster ◽  
C J Rodriguez ◽  
...  

IntroductionPelvic fractures are a common occurrence in combat trauma. However, the fracture pattern and management within the most recent conflicts, i.e. Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), have yet to be described, especially in the context of dismounted complex blast injury. Our goal was to identify the incidence, patterns of injury and management of pelvic fractures.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review on all combat-injured patients who arrived at our military treatment hospital between November 2010 and November 2012. Basic demographics, Young-Burgess fracture pattern classification and treatment strategies were examined.ResultsOf 562 patients identified within the study time period, 14% (81 of 562) were found to have a pelvic fracture. The vast majority (85%) were secondary to an improvised explosive device. The average Injury Severity Score for patients with pelvic fracture was 31±12 and 70% were classified as open. Of the 228 patients with any traumatic lower extremity amputation, 23% had pelvic fractures, while 30% of patients with bilateral above-knee amputations also sustained a pelvic fracture. The most common Young-Burgess injury pattern was anteroposterior compression (APC) (57%), followed by lateral compression (LC) (36%) and vertical shear (VS) (7%). Only 2% (nine of 562) of all patients were recorded as having pelvic binders placed in the prehospital setting. 49% of patients with pelvic fracture required procedural therapy, the most common of which was placement of a pelvic external fixator (34 of 40; 85%), followed by preperitoneal packing (16 of 40; 40%) and angioembolisation (three of 40; 0.75%). 17 (42.5%) patients required combinations of these three treatment modalities, the majority of which were a combination of external fixator and preperitoneal packing. The likelihood to need procedural therapy was impacted by injury pattern, as 72% of patients with an APC injury, 100% of patients with a VS injury and 25% of patients with an LC injury required procedural therapy.ConclusionsPelvic fractures were common concomitant injuries following blast-induced traumatic lower extremity amputations. APC was the most common pelvic fracture pattern identified. While procedural therapy was frequent, the majority of patients underwent conservative therapy. However, placement of an external fixator was the most frequently used modality. Considering angioembolisation was used in less than 1% of cases, in the forward deployed military environment, management should focus on pelvic external fixation±preperitoneal packing. Finally, prehospital pelvic binder application may be an area for further process improvement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 232 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26.e2
Author(s):  
Samer Asmar ◽  
Letitia Bible ◽  
Mohamad Chehab ◽  
Andrew Tang ◽  
Muhammad Khurrum ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S329-S330
Author(s):  
Samer Asmar ◽  
Muhammad Khurrum ◽  
Andrew Liang Tang ◽  
Letitia Bible ◽  
Narong Kulvatunyou ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S236-S242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slava M. Belenkiy ◽  
Andriy I. Batchinsky ◽  
Todd E. Rasmussen ◽  
Leopoldo C. Cancio

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda M. Marsh ◽  
Richard Betzold ◽  
Mario Rueda ◽  
Megan Morrow ◽  
Lawrence Lottenberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Edwards ◽  
Michael A. Dubick ◽  
Lee Palmer ◽  
Anthony E. Pusateri

In humans, the leading cause of potentially preventable death on the modern battlefield is undoubtedly exsanguination from massive hemorrhage. The US military and allied nations have devoted enormous effort to combat hemorrhagic shock and massive hemorrhage. This has yielded numerous advances designed to stop bleeding and save lives. The development of extremity, junctional and truncal tourniquets applied by first responders have saved countless lives both on the battlefield and in civilian settings. Additional devices such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and intraperitoneal hemostatic foams show great promise to address control the most difficult forms (non-compressible) of hemorrhage. The development of next generation hemostatic dressings has reduced bleeding both in the prehospital setting as well as in the operating room. Furthermore, the research and fielding of antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid have shown incredible promise to ameliorate the effects of acute traumatic coagulopathy which has led to significant morbidity and mortality in service members. Advances from lessons learned on the battlefield have numerous potential parallels in veterinary medicine and these lessons are ripe for translation to veterinary medicine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document