scholarly journals Long-term assessment of conventional and mini-screw–assisted rapid palatal expansion on the nasal cavity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivam Mehta ◽  
Vaibhav Gandhi ◽  
Manuel Lagravere Vich ◽  
Veerasathpurush Allareddy ◽  
Aditya Tadinada ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the long-term effects of mini-screw–assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE), rapid palatal expansion (RPE), and controls on the nasal cavity with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 180 CBCT scans that were part of a previous randomized trial were evaluated retrospectively for 60 patients at pretreatment (T1), postexpansion (T2), and posttreatment (T3). Patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups: MARPE, RPE, and controls (time period T1 to T3; MARPE: 2 years 8 months; RPE: 2 years 9 months; control: 2 years 7 months). Nasal height, nasal length, nasion–ANS height, ANS–PNS length, pyriform height, and nasal septal deviation angle were measured. The changes in alar width, alar base width, anterior nasal cavity width, posterior nasal cavity width, maxillary intermolar width, and maxillary intercanine width were also evaluated. Results The alar base width, posterior nasal cavity width, anterior nasal cavity width, maxillary intercanine width, and maxillary intermolar width significantly increased (P < .05), and the nasal septal deviation angle significantly decreased (P < .05) in both the MARPE and RPE groups as compared with controls in the short term. In the long term, the nasal septal deviation angle was significantly decreased (P < .05) in the MARPE and RPE groups as compared with controls, and the posterior nasal cavity width was significantly increased (P < .05) in the MARPE group compared with the RPE group and controls. Conclusions MARPE and RPE led to a significant increase in the nasal cavity and alar base width compared with controls in the short term. In the long term, a significant increase was observed only in the posterior nasal cavity width with MARPE. Both MARPE and RPE led to a minimal decrease in nasal septal deviation angle in comparison with controls.

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosangela Cannavale ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Letizia Perillo ◽  
Maria Grazia Piancino

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Ki Beom Kim ◽  
Renee E. Doyle ◽  
Eustáquio A. Araújo ◽  
Rolf G. Behrents ◽  
Donald R. Oliver ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukhesh Sooknundun ◽  
Santosh Kumar Kacker ◽  
Rajesh Bhatia ◽  
R.C. Deka

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle D. Smith ◽  
Paul C. Edwards ◽  
Tarnjit S. Saini ◽  
Neil S. Norton

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of concha bullosa and nasal septal deviation and their potential relationships to maxillary sinusitis. 883 CT scans taken at Creighton University School of Dentistry from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of concha bullosa, nasal septal deviation, and maxillary sinusitis. 67.5% of patients exhibited pneumatization of at least one concha, 19.4% of patients had a deviated septum, and 50.0% had mucosal thickening consistent with maxillary sinusitis. 49.3% of patients who had concha bullosa also had evidence of maxillary sinusitis. Only 19.5% of patients with concha bullosa also had nasal septal deviation, whereas 19.7% of patients with sinusitis also presented with nasal septal deviation. Although concha bullosa is a common occurrence in the nasal cavity, there did not appear to be a statistically significant relationship between the presence of concha bullosa or nasal septal deviation and maxillary sinusitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document