Impact of Switching from Sulfonylureas to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors on Hypoglycemia Burden in the United States—A Predictive Modeling Approach

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 385-P
Author(s):  
JINAN LIU ◽  
YUEXIN TANG ◽  
HAKIMA HANNACHI ◽  
SAMUEL S. ENGEL ◽  
SWAPNIL RAJPATHAK
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e37-e39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Esteban Mosquera ◽  
Nancy Torres ◽  
Jorge Restrepo ◽  
Carlos Ruz-Pau ◽  
Sowmya Suryanarayanan

Objective: To report a case of linagliptin-induced acute pancreatitis and remind clinicians about risks with incretin-based drugs. Patients at risk for pancreatitis should be switched to another type of hypoglycemic treatment. Methods: We present the case of a 74-year-old Latina who presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of epigastric pain radiating to her back. Medical history, physical exam, laboratory tests, and medical images were compatible with acute pancreatitis. Upon further investigation, common causes for her pathology were excluded. Ten weeks prior to presentation she had changed her medications for diabetes mellitus type 2 to linagliptin. Results: Using the Naranjo algorithm of adverse drug reactions, we concluded that linagliptin was the most likely culprit. Conclusion: Incretin-based drugs, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, have been shown to be relatively safe for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since their introduction to the market, conflicting data regarding pancreatic side effects have been published, including a small risk of developing acute pancreatitis with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors like sitagliptin and saxagliptin. To date there has been only 1 case report associating linagliptin with acute pancreatitis in the English medical literature. Ours is the first case report in the United States associating linagliptin with acute pancreatitis. It is worth warning both patients and prescribers about this serious adverse effect, as it might affect the choice of antiglycemic agent.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian K. Irons ◽  
Jessica M. Weis ◽  
Megan R. Stapleton ◽  
Krystal L. Edwards

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaia Lambadiari ◽  
Aikaterini Kountouri ◽  
Foteini Kousathana ◽  
Emmanouil Korakas ◽  
Georgios Kokkalis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bullous pemphigoid is the most common bullous chronic autoimmune skin disease. Recent studies have suggested dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors as possible predisposing agents of bullous pemphigoid. The objective of our study was to prospectively estimate the association between gliptins and the development of bullous pemphigoid. Methods We conducted a prospective study which included all patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven bullous pemphigoid in the Dermatology Department of our hospital between April 1, 2009 and December 31,2019. The diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid was based on specific clinical, histological and immunological features. Results Overall 113 consecutive patients (age 75 ± 13 years, 62 females) with the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid were enrolled. Seventy-six patients (67.3%) suffered from type 2 Diabetes and 52 (46%) were treated with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors. The most frequent prescribed gliptin was vildagliptin, being administered to 45 cases (39.8% of total patients enrolled, 86.5% of the patients treated with gliptins). Gliptins were withdrawn immediately after the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, which together with steroid administration led to remission of the rash. Conclusions This study revealed that treatment with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors, especially vildagliptin, is significantly associated with an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid development.


Xenobiotica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Jeong Ahn ◽  
Kwon-Bok Kim ◽  
Kwang-Hyeon Liu ◽  
Jae-Gook Shin ◽  
Jin Hee Ahn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document