Bond Strength of Newer Dentin Bonding Agents in Different Clinical Situations

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hegde ◽  
J Manjunath

Clinical RelevanceThe bond strengths of adhesive systems are affected by the amount of moisture on the bonding surface of the tooth.

10.2341/06-27 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Erkut ◽  
H. C. Küçükesmen ◽  
N. Eminkahyagil ◽  
P. Imirzalioglu ◽  
E. Karabulut

Clinical Relevance Based on in vitro results in extracted teeth, the dual bonding method used was effective in restoring the shear bond strength values that decreased after applying provisional luting agent regardless of the composition of the provisional luting agent (eugenol-based or eugenol-free) used.


10.2341/05-20 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. H. O. Mitsui ◽  
A. R. Peris ◽  
A. N. Cavalcanti ◽  
G. M. Marchi ◽  
L. A. F. Pimenta

Clinical Relevance Bond strength is affected by the combination of thermal and mechanical load cycling. However, results vary greatly with the number of mechanical cycles and adhesive system type (total or self-etching).


1988 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Pashley ◽  
L. Tao ◽  
J.R. Mackert ◽  
D.H. Pashlety

Dogs were utilized in a study to compare the bond strengths of dentin bonding agents made to dentin in vivo and then again in vitro in the same teeth 30 min, one day, one week, and one month post-extraction. No statistically significant differences were observed between bonds made in vivo and those made in vitro at any time period. Contamination of the dentin surfaces with blood or saliva lowered the bond strengths, but these could be restored to control values by re-surfacing of the dentin with a bur.


1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.H. Retief ◽  
J.D. Gross ◽  
E.L. Bradley ◽  
F.R. Denys

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document