Retrieval Effectiveness of Google on Reverse Image Search

Author(s):  
Yıltan Bitirim

This study investigates the reverse image search performance of Google, in terms of Average Precisions (APs) and Average Normalized Recalls (ANRs) at various cut-off points,on finding out similar images by using fresh Image Queries (IQs) from the five categories “Fashion,” “Computer,” “Home,” “Sports,” and “Toys.” The aim is to have an insight about retrieval effectiveness of Google on reverse image search and then motivate researchers and inform users. Five fresh IQs with different main concepts were created for each of the five categories. These 25 IQs were run on the search engine, and for each, the first 100 images retrieved were evaluated with binary relevance judgment. At the cut-off points 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100, both APs and ANRs were calculated for each category and for all 25 IQs. The AP range is from 41.60% (Toys—cut-off point 100) to 71% (Home—cut-off point 20). The ANR range is from 47.21% (Toys—cut-off point 20) to 71.31% (Computer—cut-off point 100). If the categories are ignored; when more images were evaluated, the performance of displaying relevant images in higher ranks increased, whereas the performance of retrieving relevant images decreased. It seems that the information retrieval effectiveness of Google on reverse image search needs to be improved.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aabid Hussain ◽  
Sumeer Gul ◽  
Tariq Ahmad Shah ◽  
Sheikh Shueb

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the retrieval effectiveness of three image search engines (ISE) – Google Images, Yahoo Image Search and Picsearch in terms of their image retrieval capability. It is an effort to carry out a Cranfield experiment to know how efficient the commercial giants in the image search are and how efficient an image specific search engine is. Design/methodology/approach The keyword search feature of three ISEs – Google images, Yahoo Image Search and Picsearch – was exploited to make search with keyword captions of photos as query terms. Selected top ten images were used to act as a testbed for the study, as images were searched in accordance with features of the test bed. Features to be looked for included size (1200 × 800), format of images (JPEG/JPG) and the rank of the original image retrieved by ISEs under study. To gauge the overall retrieval effectiveness in terms of set standards, only first 50 result hits were checked. Retrieval efficiency of select ISEs were examined with respect to their precision and relative recall. Findings Yahoo Image Search outscores Google Images and Picsearch both in terms of precision and relative recall. Regarding other criteria – image size, image format and image rank in search results, Google Images is ahead of others. Research limitations/implications The study only takes into consideration basic image search feature, i.e. text-based search. Practical implications The study implies that image search engines should focus on relevant descriptions. The study evaluated text-based image retrieval facilities and thereby offers a choice to users to select best among the available ISEs for their use. Originality/value The study provides an insight into the effectiveness of the three ISEs. The study is one of the few studies to gauge retrieval effectiveness of ISEs. Study also produced key findings that are important for all ISE users and researchers and the Web image search industry. Findings of the study will also prove useful for search engine companies to improve their services.


2013 ◽  
Vol 756-759 ◽  
pp. 1576-1579
Author(s):  
Min Guo

Image search engine technology is a combination of technologies of database, information retrieval, image processing and computer vision, texture recognition as well as multimedia database and network. This paper aims to present the flow chart of content-based image search engine system and explores the current image search technologies and its future development.


1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Bach ◽  
Charles Fuller ◽  
Amarnath Gupta ◽  
Arun Hampapur ◽  
Bradley Horowitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nobuyoshi Sato ◽  
Minoru Udagawa ◽  
Minoru Uehara ◽  
Yoshifumi Sakai ◽  
Hideki Mori

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 732-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Lang Beebe ◽  
Jan Guynes Clark ◽  
Glenn B. Dietrich ◽  
Myung S. Ko ◽  
Daijin Ko

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia D. Kerchner

In the early years of modern information retrieval, the fundamental way in which we understood and evaluated search performance was by measuring precision and recall. In recent decades, however, models of evaluation have expanded to incorporate the information-seeking task and the quality of its outcome, as well as the value of the information to the user. We have developed a systems engineering-based methodology for improving the whole search experience. The approach focuses on understanding users’ information-seeking problems, understanding who has the problems, and applying solutions that address these problems. This information is gathered through ongoing analysis of site-usage reports, satisfaction surveys, Help Desk reports, and a working relationship with the business owners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document