scholarly journals Soils in a young landscape on the coast of southern Finland

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.L. MOKMA ◽  
M. YLI-HALLA ◽  
H. HARTIKAINEN

Soils in an agricultural landscape on the southern coast of Finland (60° 13'N 25° 02'E) were characterized and classified according to Soil Taxonomy, the FAO-Unesco system (FAO), and the World Reference Base for Soil Resources system (WRB). The impact of human activity (

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
CW van Huyssteen

The South African Taxonomic soil classification system (SAT) is well established and utilised in South Africa. However, it is not internationally well known and therefore the need arose to provide a tool by which South African soil taxonomists can convert South African soil classifications and profile descriptions to the international classifications of the World Reference Base (WRB) for soil resources. The diagnostics and tacit knowledge presented in this publication are therefore based on the SAT and the WRB. When necessary, further substantiation was derived from the Land Type Survey of South Africa. The adopted procedure is effective in providing a reasonable classification based on the South African soil forms and families, while excluding certain WRB soil groups and qualifiers, because these are irrelevant to South African taxonomy. Lastly, this publication also highlights some peculiarities, omissions and inconsistencies observed between the SAT and WRB.


2002 ◽  
pp. 245-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozef Deckers ◽  
Paul Driessen ◽  
Freddy O.F. Nachtergaele ◽  
Otto Spaargaren ◽  
Frank Berding

Soil Research ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 167 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Morand

Few soil surveys in New South Wales have utilised international soil classifications. Extensive morphological and laboratory data collected during soil surveys in the Northern Rivers region provided a strong basis for correlation with the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB), Soil Taxonomy (ST), and the Australian Soil Classification (ASC). Of the 32 reference soil groups comprising the WRB, 20 were present locally; nine of the 12 ST orders were present. After re-classification of soils, correlation of the ASC with the WRB and ST was undertaken. Soils not requiring extensive laboratory analysis for classification and sharing similar central concepts were the more straightforward to correlate. Several ASC orders have unique central concepts and were therefore difficult to correlate with any one WRB reference soil group or ST order/suborder. Other soils were difficult to correlate due to differences in definitions of similar diagnostic criteria. This is most applicable to soils with strong texture-contrast and those with natric conditions. Such soils are not adequately differentiated to suit the Northern Rivers conditions. Of the two international schemes, the WRB was easier to apply locally due to the relative simplicity of the scheme. Considering certain aspects of Australian soils would improve the applicability of the WRB as a truly international framework for soil classification and correlation. Amendments to both the ASC and WRB are suggested.


Geoderma ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 286-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Jabiol ◽  
Augusto Zanella ◽  
Jean-François Ponge ◽  
Giacomo Sartori ◽  
Michael Englisch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Samira Afrasiyab Hasanova ◽  
Adalat Bakhtiyar Pashayev ◽  
Elhan Nariman Sabziev

Soil Science ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 161 (9) ◽  
pp. 604-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadao Shoji ◽  
Masami Nanzyo ◽  
Randy A. Dahlgren ◽  
Paul Quantin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document