Do Korean Banks Selectively Realize Securities Gains and Losses to Manage Operating Income and Regulatory Capital?

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 89-123
Author(s):  
Gun Jae Lee
Author(s):  
Reza Mohammadi

Based on a large sample of publicly listed and non-listed US commercial banks from 1996 to 2011, we find robust evidence consistent with banks using realized available for sale (AFS) securities gains and losses to smooth earnings and increase low regulatory capital. We also find that (i) banks with positive earnings smooth earnings, and banks with negative earnings generally take big baths; (ii) regulatory capital constrains big baths; (iii) banks with more negative earnings and more unrealized beginning-of-quarter losses (gains) take big baths (smooth earnings); and (iv) banks with low regulatory capital and more unrealized gains realize more gains. Also, banks with negative earnings tak big baths (avoid or reduce the earnings loss) if their unrealized gains are insufficient (sufficient) to offset the negative earnings. Our inferences apply to listed and non-listed banks, which indicates that the earnings management incentives do not derive solely from public capital markets. Our findings reveal that the accounting for AFS securities gains and losses enables banks to manage regulatory capital and earnings in a variety of ways.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Marshall ◽  
Andrew Lennard

SYNOPSIS:This paper contributes to the development of a “Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting” as currently being undertaken by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Building on the ideas of “asymmetric prudence” and the business model, it contrasts “value added” and “price change” businesses and argues that an entry price is appropriate for the operating assets of the former kind of business while a current market value is appropriate for the latter. It notes that both historical cost and current cost are entry values. While accepting that historical cost is likely to continue to be widely used, it questions whether the Conceptual Framework should preclude the use of current cost, and argues that if current cost is to be used, then the cost of consumption should be reported separately from holding gains and losses. The paper advocates the reporting of operating income, and discusses what items of income and expense should be reported in other comprehensive income rather than in profit or loss. It questions whether all such items should be “recycled” to the statement of profit or loss in a later accounting period.


1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome L. Myers ◽  
Mary M. Suydam ◽  
Blase Gambino
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Canessa ◽  
Gabriele Chierchia ◽  
Matteo Motterlini ◽  
Gabriel Baud-Bovy ◽  
Stefano Cappa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document