scholarly journals Moving Average Trading Rules for NASDAQ Composite Index

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Ping Chen

This paper tests a few moving average technical trading rules for the NASDAQ Composite and Goldman Sack commodity indexes from 1972 to 2015. Our results indicate that moving average rules do exhibit strong predictive power for NADSAQ composite index but much weaker predictive power for GSCI. Can a trader use this predictive to beat the B&H strategy? We show that MA-100 days could most of the time make an abnormal profit in the case of NASDAQ composite index by considering both transaction costs and risk. 

Author(s):  
Camillo Lento ◽  
Nikola Gradojevic

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 34.2pt 0pt 0.5in; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;" lang="EN-CA">The focus of this paper is to determine the profitability of technical trading rules by evaluating their ability to outperform the na&iuml;ve buy-and-hold trading strategy. Moving average cross-over rules, filter rules, Bollinger Bands, and trading range break-out rules are tested on the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;" lang="EN-CA">S&amp;P/TSX 300 Index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index, NASDAQ Composite Index, and the Canada/U.S. spot exchange rate<span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">. After accounting for transaction costs, excess returns are generated by the moving average cross-over rules and trading range break-out rules for the </span>S&amp;P/TSX 300 Index<span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">, </span>NASDAQ Composite Index and the Canada/U.S. spot exchange rate<span style="mso-bidi-font-style: italic;">. Filter rules also earn excess returns when applied on the Canada/U.S. spot exchange rate. The bootstrap methodology is used to determine the statistical significance of the results. The profitability of the technical trading rules is further enhanced with a combined signal approach.</span></span></span></p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi ◽  
Xavier Garza-Gomez ◽  
Yong Glasure ◽  
Yung-Ho Chang

<p class="MsoBodyText2" style="text-justify: inter-ideograph; text-align: justify; line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">This paper tests three moving average technical trading rules for the Mexican Stock Market. </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">Results indicate that moving average rules do indeed have predictive power and can discern recurring-price patterns for profitable trading and support the hypothesis that technical trading rules can outperform the buy-and-hold strategy. Break-even one-way trading costs are estimated to be</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-weight: normal; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';"><strong> </strong></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman';">in the range of 1% to 3% over the period under consideration. These break-even costs, we believe, are large compared to recent estimates of actual trading costs, implying that moving average trading rules have predictive power and can generate consistent profits even after transaction costs are considered. </span></span></p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 585-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Li ◽  
Steven Shuye Wang

We examine the performance of technical trading rules in Chinese domestic A-share and foreign B-share markets. After controlling for non-synchronous trading and transaction costs, we find evidence to support the predictability and profitability of some of the most popular technical trading rules for B-shares but not for A-shares. However, after February 19, 2001, when domestic investors were allowed to trade B-shares, the predictive power of the trading rules in B-share markets disappeared. We conjecture that the predictability of technical trading rules in B-share markets can be attributed to the gradual diffusion of information among foreign investors under the foreign share ownership restriction, and, partly, to positive autocorrelations induced by thin trading.


Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi ◽  
Xavier Garza-Gomez ◽  
Chien-Ping Chen ◽  
Stanley Monsef

This paper tests three moving average technical trading rules for the S&P 500 stock index. Using daily data from 1954 to 2004, our results indicate that moving average rules did indeed had predictive power and could discern recurring-price patterns for the period up to mid 1980s. However, since mid 1980s, technical trading rules do not work and could not discern recurring-price patterns. Our results are consistent with market inefficiency from 1954 to 1984 and market efficiency from 1984 to present.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-32
Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi

We apply several well-known technical indicators to the daily data for the Athens Composite Share Price from 1/2/2000 to 12/31/2012.  Our findings strongly support the predictive power of technical trading rules; further, we ask whether this predictive power of technical analysis can be exploited to beat the profitability of the buy-and-hold strategy considering both transaction costs and risk.  We conclude that it is possible to beat the buy-and-hold strategy even considering transaction costs and risk.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi

Market Efficiency and Profitability of Technical Trading Rules: Evidence from Vietnam Abstract            We apply several well-known and popular technical indicators to the daily data for the Vietnam Ho Chi Minh stock index (VSI) from 5/15/2002 to October 31 of 2012.  The empirical results strongly support the predictive power of technical trading rules; these strong results also hold for each sub-period analyzed. Further, we ask whether a trader can use the predictive power of technical analysis to beat the profitability of the buy-and-hold strategy considering both transaction costs and risk.  Designing four strategies of various trading rules, we conclude that it is possible to beat the buy-and-hold strategy even considering transaction costs and risk.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi ◽  
John Kagochi ◽  
Linda A. Hayes

<p>We apply several popular technical trading rules in the normal way and a contrarian way to daily data of the Nairobi Stock Index from 9/12/2006 to 4/18/2013. The contrarian usage of popular technical trading rules implies that when a technical trading indicator emits buy (sell) signals, we do the opposite and sell (buy) the index. Results from the study support the predictive power of contrarian technical trading rules. We also investigate whether a trader can use the predictive power of contrarian technical rules to beat the profitability of the buy-and-hold strategy considering both transaction costs and risk. Designing four strategies of various contrarian trading rules, we conclude that it is possible to beat the buy-and-hold strategy even considering transaction costs and risk.</p>


Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi ◽  
Yong Glasure ◽  
Xavier Garza-Gomez ◽  
Chien Chen

Two moving average technical trading rules for the Austrian stock market are tested. Results indicate that moving average rules do indeed have predictive power and could discern recurring-price patterns for profitable trading. Results also support the hypothesis that technical trading rules can outperform the buy-and-hold strategy. Break-even one-way trading costs are estimated to be between .61 and 2.36 %. These break-even costs are larger than recent estimates of actual trading costs, implying profitable trading rules for the Austrian stock market.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massoud Metghalchi ◽  
Adriano Pinho ◽  
Adriana Sarmento

We apply two well-known technical indicators to the Polish Stock index over the period of 9/4/1998 to 4/18/2013. Our findings support the predictive power of technical trading rules for each sub-period and for the entire period. We then ask whether an investor can use the predictive power of technical analysis to beat the profitability of the buy-and-hold strategy considering both transaction costs and risk. We conclude that it is not possible to beat the buy and hold strategy when considering transaction costs and risk. We could say the Polish market is efficient. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Efstathios Xanthopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Aravossis ◽  
Spyros Papathanasiou

This paper investigates the profitability of technical trading rules in the Athens Stock Exchange (ASE), utilizing the FTSE Large Capitalization index over the seven-year period 2005-2012, which was before and during the Greek crisis. The technical rules that will be explored are the simple moving average, the envelope (parallel bands) and the slope (regression). We compare technical trading strategies in the spirit of Brock, Lakonishok, and LeBaron (1992), employing traditional t-test and Bootstrap methodology under the Random Walk with drift, AR(1) and GARCH(1,1) models. We enrich our analysis via Fourier analysis technique (FFT) and more statistical tests. The results provide strong evidence on the profitability of the examined technical trading rules, even during recession period (2009-2012), and contradict the Efficient Market Hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document