scholarly journals ¿Por qué no el paradigma teísta? Un diálogo con La mente y el cosmos de Thomas Nagel

Author(s):  
Francisco Rodríguez Valls
Keyword(s):  

En La mente y el cosmos, Thomas Nagel critica los paradigmas reduccionistas en ciencia natural y considera la posibilidad del teísmo aunque acaba rechazándolo. Este trabajo analiza los argumentos de Nagel para tal rechazo y establece la legitimidad de sostener tal paradigma.

Author(s):  
Jens Schlieter

This chapter, an excursus, embarks on a more philosophical interpretation of consciousness and experience. Building on Thomas Nagel and Niklas Luhmann, it is argued that human consciousness, defined as a process of self-reproduction of never-ending new possibilities, is perplexed by the task of imagining its own nonexistence. Given that consciousness is not equipped for this task, that is to imagine death (its own nonexistence), it will react with a search for meaning, a context for the existential threat. The excursus argues that this leads to the highly accelerated activity of consciousness. It may result in a phenomenon reported by a certain number of near-death experiencers, namely, the life review. In short, then, the life review is a highly accelerated search for meaning. These deliberations are further substantiated by a comparison with “wake-up dreams,” in which a similar structure becomes visible.


Ethics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Darwall
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-193
Author(s):  
Robert E. Lauder
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-484
Author(s):  
Michael Neumann

Contemporary moral philosophy and much contemporary moralizing almost radiate respect for persons. Thomas Nagel is one of many who take its primacy for granted. In a review of Scanion he says:Scanlon's theory addresses a number of its central questions: first, the question of the objectivity or truth of moral Claims, their relation to reason, and whether or not they should be regarded as in some sense relative or subjective; second, the question of the kind of concern or respect for persons that is at the foundation of morality…Many others take the centrality and foundational role of such respect as a given. This is a big change from the days when moralists held that all human beings deserved a certain basic and equal disrespect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document