Acellular fish skin grafts for the management of wounds in dogs and cats: 17 cases (2019–2021)

Author(s):  
Elise S. Mauer ◽  
Elizabeth A. Maxwell ◽  
Christina J. Cocca ◽  
Justin Ganjei ◽  
Daniel Spector

Abstract OBJECTIVE To report the clinical outcomes of the use of acellular fish skin grafts (FSGs) for the management of complex soft tissue wounds of various etiologies in dogs and cats. ANIMALS 13 dogs and 4 cats with complex wounds treated with FSGs between February 2019 and March 2021. PROCEDURES Medical records were reviewed for information regarding cause, location, size of the wound, management techniques, complications, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS In dogs, the number of FSG applications ranged from 1 to 4 (median, 2 graft applications). The time between each application ranged from 4 to 21 days (median, 9.5 days). Time to application of the first FSG ranged from 9 to 210 days (median, 19 days). Wounds closed by second-intention healing following the first fish skin application between 26 and 145 days (median, 71 days; n = 12). In cats, 1 or 2 FSGs were used, and the wounds of 3 of 4 cats healed completely by secondary intention. The wounds of 1 dog and 1 cat did not heal. There were no adverse events attributed to the use of the FSGs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE For dogs and cats of the present study, complete healing of most wounds occurred with the use of FSGs, the application of which did not require special training, instruments, or bandage materials.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Friedstat ◽  
Michelle R Coriddi ◽  
Eric G Halvorson ◽  
Joseph J Disa

Principles of initial wound management include adequate debridement, bacterial contamination assessment, nutritional optimization, and moist wound healing versus the use of negative-pressure wound therapy. The main goals of coverage procedures are to achieve a healed wound and avoid infection. Aside from allowing to heal by secondary intention, options for wound closure include primary closure, skin grafting, local flaps, and free flaps. Each wound should be evaluated on an individual basis to determine which method of coverage is most appropriate. This review contains 13 figures, 2 tables, and 22 references. Key Words: free tissue transfer, pedicle flaps, soft-tissue coverage, wound closure, wound healing, wound management, wound reconstruction, tissue flaps


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Friedstat ◽  
Michelle R Coriddi ◽  
Eric G Halvorson ◽  
Joseph J Disa

Principles of initial wound management include adequate debridement, bacterial contamination assessment, nutritional optimization, and moist wound healing versus the use of negative-pressure wound therapy. The main goals of coverage procedures are to achieve a healed wound and avoid infection. Aside from allowing to heal by secondary intention, options for wound closure include primary closure, skin grafting, local flaps, and free flaps. Each wound should be evaluated on an individual basis to determine which method of coverage is most appropriate. This review contains 13 figures, 2 tables, and 22 references. Key Words: free tissue transfer, pedicle flaps, soft-tissue coverage, wound closure, wound healing, wound management, wound reconstruction, tissue flaps


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadri Ozer ◽  
Ozlem Colak

Abstract Background Generally, advanced wound care resources are applied for complex wounds that pose a challenge to the medical and nursing teams. In this report, the use of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) is emphasized for complex wounds as an alternative, simple, inexpensive, time-saving process that does not require hospitalization and has a healing potential over that of bare soft tissue, including bone, tendon, and ligaments. The aim of this study is to extend the use of L-PRF in small-to-moderate-sized complex wounds of lower extremities in which L-PRF maintains the sensitive structures viable. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2017, 17 small-to-moderate-sized complex wounds of lower extremities treated with L-PRF were recruited from the plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic in Aydin State Hospital, Turkey. The treatment was administered twice per week in the outpatient clinic. Depending on the size and extension of the complex wound, two to five blood samples were collected into 8.5 ml dry, glass vacuum tubes with no anticoagulant, and samples were immediately centrifuged at 1630×g for 5 min to obtain L-PRF. Complete healing was defined as the day of complete wound epithelialization. Results The median values of the initial wound size and wound duration were 12 cm2 (interquartile range, 6 to 23 cm2) and 8 months before first admission (interquartile range, 4 to 18 months), respectively. All wounds showed significant improvements after L-PRF therapy and full closure after a median of 18 months, with an interquartile range of 11 to 34 months of L-PRF applications. There were recurrences of wounds during the first 6 months after therapy. No adverse events were observed. Conclusions Our results add to the growing evidence that L-PRF treatments protect and maintain bare soft tissue structures viable, facilitate the formation of granulation tissue and epithelization, and remarkably reduce the need for additional soft tissue surgeries in small-to-medium-sized complex wounds.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S35-S36
Author(s):  
James B. Lutz ◽  
Joy E. Schank

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S61-S62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takkin Lo ◽  
Patrick Moore ◽  
Nancy Cortes Delamora ◽  
Noha Daher

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Friedstat ◽  
Michelle R Coriddi ◽  
Eric G Halvorson ◽  
Joseph J Disa

Wound management and soft-tissue repair can vary depending on the location. The head and neck, chest and back, arm and forearm, hand, abdomen, gluteal area and perineum, thigh, knee, lower leg, and foot all have different local options and preferred free flaps to use for reconstruction. Secondary reconstruction requires a detailed analysis of all aspects of the wound including any scars, soft tissue and/or skin deficits, functional defects, contour defects, complex or composite defects, and/or unstable previous wound coverage. Careful monitoring of both the patient and reconstruction is necessary in the postoperative period to ensure long-term success.   This review contains 2 figures and 17 references. Key Words: free tissue transfer, pedicle flaps, soft-tissue coverage, wound closure, wound healing, wound management, wound reconstruction, tissue flaps


Author(s):  
Oneida A. Arosarena ◽  
Issam N. Eid

AbstractSoft tissue trauma to the face is challenging to manage due to functional and aesthetic concerns. Management requires careful regional considerations to maintain function such as visual fields and oral competence in periorbital and perioral injuries, respectively. Basic wound management principles apply to facial soft tissue injuries including copious irrigation and tension-free closure. There is no consensus and high-level evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis especially in various bite injuries. Ballistic injuries and other mechanisms are briefly reviewed. Scar revision for soft tissue injuries can require multiple procedures and interventions. Surgery as well as office procedures such as resurfacing with lasers can be employed and will be reviewed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S195-S195
Author(s):  
Nicole M Kopari ◽  
Yazen Qumsiyeh

Abstract Introduction Complex wounds (CW) resulting from necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) and soft tissue traumatic injuries create unique challenges. Radical debridement is often the first step in management but can result in disfigurement with impaired function and compromised cosmesis. The standard of care at our institution for full-thickness burn injuries of similar complexity is widely meshed autografting with application of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS). Our study is a case series reviewing outcomes using ASCS for CW from non-burn etiology. Methods A retrospective chart review from March 2019 through July 2020 was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of ASCS and widely meshed autografting in CW. Patients presenting with CW underwent serial excisions of devitalized tissue by acute care and burn surgeons. Dermal substitute utilization for wound preparation was at the discretion of the surgeon. Definitive wound closure was achieved using ASCS in combination with a widely meshed autograft. The wounds were covered with a non-adherent, non-absorbent, small pore primary dressing along with bismuth-impregnated, petroleum-based gauze or negative pressure wound therapy dependent on wound bed contour. Further padding with gauze was applied along with compressive dressing. Results In total, 8 patients with CW were included in this review. The mean age was 58 years (range 27-85) with an equal number of males and females. Wound etiology included NSTI (n=5), degloving injury (n=2), and traumatic amputation (n=1). The average wound size measured 1,300cm2 (range 300-3,000). 50% of the patients were treated with a dermal substitute and negative pressure wound therapy prior to ASCS and autograft placement. 7 of 8 patients received split-thickness skin grafting in the ratio of 3:1 with one patient grafted at a 2:1 expansion. 7 of the 8 patients had >90% wound closure within 8-10 days of ASCS and autograft application. One patient had significant graft failure after removing surgical dressings and autograft in the early post-operative period secondary to dementia. One patient expired during the follow-up period secondary to medical comorbidities. The 6 remaining patients had durable wound closure and acceptable cosmetic outcome. All patients were discharged within 10 days of ASCS application with 4 patients discharging home and 4 patients discharging to an acute inpatient rehabilitation. Conclusions This study is the first case series to review ASCS in combination with widely meshed skin grafts in the management of CW from a non-burn etiology. Durable, timely wound closure and an acceptable cosmetic outcome was achieved in these often-challenging CW.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document