Influence of Different Preparatory Sets on Reaction Time and Arm-Movement Time

1980 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimihiro Inomata

The effect of three different preparatory sets on reaction time (RT), movement time (MT) and reaction time-movement time (RT-MT) relationship was examined. All 15 subjects were required to perform under the three conditions regarding the relative payoff of stimulus and speed of movement. No significant effect on RT was found, while the significant difference between MT under MT-payoff condition and MT under RT-payoff condition was found. The correlations between RT and MT under MT-payoff condition and RT-MT-payoff condition are significant ( p < .05). Also high canonical correlation between RTs and MTs was found. Results suggested that the motor program in the simple task may be executed more effectively under MT-payoff condition than RT-payoff conditions and also that a certain amount of generality between RT and MT under the payoff conditions might exist in multivariate domains.

1970 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry W. Thornton ◽  
Paul D. Jacobs

Two tasks (simple and choice reaction time) were examined while varying three types of stressors (shock, threat of shock, and noise) and the stressor task relationship (i.e., task-related stress, task-unrelated stress, and no-stress). Four specific hypotheses were tested and 3 were supported in the simple reaction-time task. There were no significant differences among stressors for either task, although greater differences were reported in the simple than in the choice reaction-time task. A significant difference between the “task-relatedness” of stress levels in the simple task was interpreted as possibly due to a “coping” or “protective adaptive mechanism” in which increases in performance serve to reduce stress. Practical applications were examined.


1968 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon E. Smith

The motor performance of 32 college men was measured on the following tests: arm strength, arm reaction and movement times, arm-and-leg serial reaction and movement times. Specificity of variance of individual differences was found for single, simple, and discrete limb movements and for three programmed series of large RT-MT movements which involved 240 responses.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (69) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Mickevičienė ◽  
Kristina Motiejūnaitė ◽  
Albertas Skurvydas ◽  
Tomas Darbutas ◽  
Diana Karanauskienė

The aim of the research was to determine how the reaction time and the movement speed depend on the complexity of the task. The research was carried out in the Laboratory of Human Motor Control at the Lithuanian Academy of Physical Education (LAPE) applying the analyzer of dynamic parameters of human leg and arm movement (DPA-1; Patent No. 5251; 2005 08 25), which is used for the qualitative estimation of the dynamic parameters of one arm and leg target movement, two arms and legs coordinated and independent target movements, when the resistance power and target are coded with different programmable parameters. We registered the reaction time (RT) and the movement speed (Vmax) performing simple tasks of reaction and speed and a complicated task of accuracy. Research results indicated that performing a complicated task the reaction is slower, and the maximal movement speed is lower than performing a simple task. However, it does not mean that movement speed will be higher when the reaction is faster performing a simple task. The data obtained confirmed Hick’s law proposing that reaction time is directly proportional to the complexity of the task because performing the tasks of different levels of complexity the reaction time values of the right arm were statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). After performing the analysis of variation coefficients we established that the highest coefficient of variation was received from the indices of movement speed performing a speed task (23%), and the lowest — of reaction time performing a reaction task (10%). The obtained results confirm other authors’ suggestion that performing a complicated task the reaction time is a more steadily controlled index than maximal movement speed. A strong correlation was determined between the reaction time values performing the tasks of reaction and accuracy, but there was no statistical link between the maximal speed values performing the tasks of speed and accuracy. This indicates that if the movement speed is high performing a simple task, it does not mean that it will be high performing a complicated task. Conclusions: 1) performing a complicated task reaction time is longer, and maximal movement speed is lower than performing a simple task; 2) the complexity of the task more impacts the dispersion of results of the movement speed than of the reaction time; 3) high speed performing a simple task does not indicate that it will be high performing a complicated task.Keywords: reaction time, movement speed, the complexity of the task.


1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 1001-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive Layton

Correlations between reaction-time + movement-time and age on two punching and two kicking techniques were nonsignificant. This was interpreted as providing some evidence to support the contention that the very practice of Shotokan karate keeps speed of technique at a fast level.


1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Schultz ◽  
A. Studer ◽  
R. Romo ◽  
E. Sundstrom ◽  
G. Jonsson ◽  
...  

1. We quantitatively assessed deficits in the initiation and execution of arm movements occurring after destruction of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons by systemic administration of MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) (Sigma). Three monkeys performed a reaction time task in which they reached toward a single and constant target for food reward. 2. After administration of MPTP, all three monkeys showed hypokinesia necessitating dopamine precursor or receptor agonist treatment. The partial recovery of one animal from initial akinesia after 19 days permitted discontinuation of dopaminergic drug therapy, although marked hypokinesia remained present. The two other animals displayed additional, intermittent phases of rigidity and activation tremor and needed continuous dopaminergic drug therapy for most of the postlesion period. 3. Administration of MPTP significantly prolonged EMG reaction time in prime mover muscles and arm movement reaction time by 47-225% and 18-129%, respectively, on the six sides of the three animals, compared with control measurements before the lesion. EMG and arm movement reaction time increased over consecutive trials in most sessions comprising 110–130 movements, the first 20 movements showing almost normal values. The delay time between onsets of EMG and arm movement showed unsystematic changes. These deficits in movement initiation were observed both with and without dopamine precursor therapy. They lasted during the whole testing period of several months. 4. Linear correlations between arm movement onset and EMG onset in the two prime mover muscles, the extensor digitorum communis and the biceps, showed coefficients of mostly 0.7–0.9, both before and after MPTP. These data suggest that the temporal relationship between onsets of arm movement and EMG were not substantially affected by MPTP. 5. Arm movement time was divided into two phases. The duration of movement between the resting key and the target, a small food-containing box located ahead of the animal, was denoted as reaching movement time. The following hand manipulation inside the food box was measured as box movement time. After MPTP, both measures were significantly prolonged by 10-103% and 12–251%, respectively, on the six sides of the three monkeys. These deficits in movement execution were observed both with and without dopaminergic drug therapy and during the whole testing period. 6. Task performance after MPTP treatment was studied in one monkey in the absence of dopaminergic drug therapy. EMG and arm movement reaction times recovered partially over several weeks, while the prolongations in reaching and box movement times remained unchanged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


1992 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim D. Whitley ◽  
Lou Montano

Interrelationships among reaction time, movement time, and win-loss percentage were studied for 16 college wrestlers who executed a standard wrestling double-leg attack .62 m in length. There was a significant correlation of .64 between reaction time and movement time, which differed from the typical pattern of nonsignificant and significant but small correlations previously reported in reaction time-movement time studies of both athletes and nonathletes. This departure from the magnitude of correlation commonly reported between these variables (explained by Henry's theory of neuromotor specificity) was thought to be related to the fact that reaction time and movement time in wrestling movements are taught as a single, common response. Another finding of interest was a significant correlation (−.62) between movement time and win-loss record. This finding indicates that in this small group of wrestlers movement time played a more important role in their success than reaction time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document