simple reaction time task
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Maslovat ◽  
Christin M. Sadler ◽  
Victoria Smith ◽  
Allison Bui ◽  
Anthony N. Carlsen

AbstractIn a simple reaction time task, the presentation of a startling acoustic stimulus has been shown to trigger the prepared response at short latency, known as the StartReact effect. However, it is unclear under what conditions it can be assumed that the loud stimulus results in response triggering. The purpose of the present study was to examine how auditory stimulus intensity and preparation level affect the probability of involuntary response triggering and the incidence of activation in the startle reflex indicator of sternocleidomastoid (SCM). In two reaction time experiments, participants were presented with an irrelevant auditory stimulus of varying intensities at various time points prior to the visual go-signal. Responses were independently categorized as responding to either the auditory or visual stimulus and those with or without SCM activation (i.e., SCM+/−). Both the incidence of response triggering and proportion of SCM+ trials increased with stimulus intensity and presentation closer to the go-signal. Data also showed that participants reacted to the auditory stimulus at a much higher rate on trials where the auditory stimulus elicited SCM activity versus those that did not, and a logistic regression analysis confirmed that SCM activation is a reliable predictor of response triggering for all conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soojin Lee ◽  
Paul F. Smith ◽  
Won Hee Lee ◽  
Martin J. McKeown

Background: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is being increasingly explored as a non-invasive brain stimulation technique to treat symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). To date, behavioral GVS effects in PD have been explored with only two stimulus types, direct current and random noise (RN). The interaction between GVS effects and anti-parkinsonian medication is unknown. In the present study, we designed multisine (ms) stimuli and investigated the effects of ms and RN GVS on motor response time. In comparison to the RN stimulus, the ms stimuli contained sinusoidal components only at a set of desired frequencies and the phases were optimized to improve participants' comfort. We hypothesized GVS motor effects were a function of stimulation frequency, and specifically, that band-limited ms-GVS would result in better motor performance than conventionally used broadband RN-GVS.Materials and Methods: Eighteen PD patients (PDMOFF/PDMON: off-/on-levodopa medication) and 20 healthy controls (HC) performed a simple reaction time task while receiving sub-threshold GVS. Each participant underwent nine stimulation conditions: off-stimulation, RN (4–200 Hz), ms-θ (4–8 Hz), ms-α (8–13 Hz), ms-β (13–30 Hz), ms-γ (30–50 Hz), ms-h1 (50–100 Hz), ms-h2 (100–150 Hz), and ms-h3 (150–200 Hz).Results: The ms-γ resulted in shorter response time (RPT) in both PDMOFF and HC groups compared with the RN. In addition, the RPT of the PDMOFF group decreased during the ms-β while the RPT of the HC group decreased during the ms-α, ms-h1, ms-h2, and ms-h3. There was considerable inter-subject variability in the optimum stimulus type, although the frequency range tended to fall within 8–100 Hz. Levodopa medication significantly reduced the baseline RPT of the PD patients. In contrast to the off-medication state, GVS did not significantly change RPT of the PD patients in the on-medication state.Conclusions: Using band-limited ms-GVS, we demonstrated that the GVS frequency for the best RPT varied considerably across participants and was >30 Hz for half of the PDMOFF patients. Moreover, dopaminergic medication was found to influence GVS effects in PD patients. Our results indicate the common “one-size-fits-all” RN approach is suboptimal for PD, and therefore personalized stimuli aiming to address this variability is warranted to improve GVS effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Suarez ◽  
Bertrand Eynard ◽  
Sylvie Granon

Traditionally, neuropsychological testing has assessed processing speed and precision, closely related to the ability to perform high-order cognitive tasks. An individual making a decision under time pressure must constantly rebalance its speed to action in order to account for possible errors. A deficit in processing speed appears to be afrequent disorder caused by cerebral damage — but it can be hard to pinpoint the exact cause of the slowdown. It is therefore important to separate the perceptual-motor component of processing speed from the decision-time component. We present a technique to isolate Reaction Times (RTs): a short digital test to assess the decision-making abilities of individuals by gauging their ability to balance between speed and precision. Our hypothesis is that some subjects willaccelerate, and others slow down in the face of the difficulty. This pilot study, conducted on 83 neurotypical adult volunteers, used images stimuli. The test was designed to measure RTs and correctness. After learning release gesture, the subjects were presented with three tasks: a simple Reaction Time task, a Go/No-Go, and a complex Go/No-Go with 2 simultaneous Choices. All three tasks have in common a perceptual component and a motor response. By measuring the 3 reference points requiring attentional and executive processing, while progressively increasing the conceptual complexity of the task, we were able to compare the processing times for different tasks — thus calculating the deceleration specific to the reaction time linked to difficulty. We defined the difficulty coefficient of a task as being the ratio of the group average time of this task minus the base time/average time of the unit task minus the base time. We found that RTs can be broken down into three elementary, uncorrelated components: Reaction Time, Executive Speed, and Reaction to Difficulty (RD). We hypothesized that RD reflects how the subject reacts to difficulty by accelerating (RD < 0) or decelerating (RD > 0). Thus we provide here a first proof of concept: the ability to measure four axes of the speed-precision trade-off inherent in a subject’s fundamental decision making: perceptual-motor speed, executive speed, subject accuracy, and reaction to difficulty.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 669
Author(s):  
Paweł Krukow ◽  
Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik ◽  
Arkadiusz Podkowiński

Aggrandized fluctuations in the series of reaction times (RTs) are a very sensitive marker of neurocognitive disorders present in neuropsychiatric populations, pathological ageing and in patients with acquired brain injury. Even though it was documented that processing inconsistency founds a background of higher-order cognitive functions disturbances, there is a vast heterogeneity regarding types of task used to compute RT-related variability, which impedes determining the relationship between elementary and more complex cognitive processes. Considering the above, our goal was to develop a relatively new assessment method based on a simple reaction time paradigm, conducive to eliciting a controlled range of intra-individual variability. It was hypothesized that performance variability might be induced by manipulation of response-stimulus interval’s length and regularity. In order to verify this hypothesis, a group of 107 healthy students was tested using a series of digitalized tasks and their results were analyzed using parametric and ex-Gaussian statistics of RTs distributional markers. In general, these analyses proved that intra-individual variability might be evoked by a given type of response-stimulus interval manipulation even when it is applied to the simple reaction time task. Collected outcomes were discussed with reference to neuroscientific concepts of attentional resources and functional neural networks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 792-792
Author(s):  
Sarah Fraser ◽  
Talia Salzman ◽  
Hyejun Kim ◽  
Hawazin Badawi ◽  
Diana Tobon Vallejo ◽  
...  

Abstract Navigating stairs is a complex motor activity and while it provides health benefits it can also increase the risk of falls in older adults (OA). The prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributions to stairclimbing (with or without a cognitive task) remain unknown. Using functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS) and wireless insoles, this study evaluated cerebral oxygenation changes (∆HbO2) in the PFC, gait parameters (speed) and cognitive performance (reaction time(RT)/accuracy) during stair ascent and descent in single (SMup/SMdown) and dual task (DTup/DTdown) conditions. OAs navigated stairs with or without a simple reaction time task. Participants had longer RTs in DTup (p < .001) and DTdown (p <.001) in comparison to standing, with no significant differences in accuracy or walk speed. ∆HbO2 was significantly different (p = .003) between SMdown and DTdown. Findings suggest that despite the simplicity of the cognitive task, dual-tasking on stairs resulted in increased cerebral oxygenation and slowed cognitive responses.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A48-A49
Author(s):  
K M Mullins ◽  
A M Reynolds

Abstract Introduction Studies examining sleep factors and cognition suggest that sleep impacts cognitive performance in college students. The focus of the current study was to examine normal sleep patterns in college-aged students and how their sleep affected their cognitive performance. Methods Participants were 51 undergraduate students (18 males), average age M=20.25 (SD=1.78) years, who wore actigraph watches to measure their sleep. After one week, participants completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) to assess fatigue and performed a series of cognitive tasks on the computer, including the Stroop Color-Word test. Participants responded to the color of the word presented on the screen instead of the word itself. Stimuli where the color and word did not match were considered incongruent stimuli. Participants also performed a simple reaction time task, where they reacted to an “X” stimulus on the screen. Results Mean sleep efficiency was 82.55% (SD=5.70), mean sleep duration was 6.59 hours (SD=79.19 minutes), and the mean MAF score was 21.17 (SD= 7.64). A Pearson correlation indicated a significant negative association between sleep duration and Stroop congruent errors r(49) = -.467, p = .001. Furthermore, a Pearson correlation indicated a significant positive association between sleep duration and incongruent reaction time, r(49)= .290, p= .039 and a significant positive association between sleep duration and simple reaction time, r(49)= .277, p= .049. MAF scores were positively correlated with simple reaction times, r(49)= .376, p=.008. Sleep efficiency was not correlated with any of the cognitive measures. Conclusion As expected, participants’ sleep was short and inefficient. Results were expected in that participants made fewer errors with increased sleep, but, unexpectedly, reaction times also increased with more sleep. Fatigue may have played a role in this relationship. It is important to continue this research in order to learn more about sleep factors and cognitive function in college students. Support None


Author(s):  
Carly Iacullo ◽  
Darcy A. Diesburg ◽  
Jan R. Wessel

AbstractMotor inhibition is a key control mechanism that allows humans to rapidly adapt their actions in response to environmental events. One of the hallmark signatures of rapidly exerted, reactive motor inhibition is the non-selective suppression of cortico-spinal excitability (CSE): unexpected sensory stimuli lead to a suppression of CSE across the entire motor system, even in muscles that are inactive. Theories suggest that this reflects a fast, automatic, and broad engagement of inhibitory control, which facilitates behavioral adaptations to unexpected changes in the sensory environment. However, it is an open question whether such non-selective CSE suppression is truly due to the unexpected nature of the sensory event, or whether it is sufficient for an event to be merely infrequent (but not unexpected). Here, we report data from two experiments in which human subjects experienced both unexpected and expected infrequent events during a simple reaction time task while CSE was measured from a task-unrelated muscle. We found that expected infrequent events can indeed produce non-selective CSE suppression – but only when they occur during movement initiation. In contrast, unexpected infrequent events produce non-selective CSE suppression even in the absence of movement initiation. Moreover, CSE suppression due to unexpected events occurs at shorter latencies compared to expected infrequent events. These findings demonstrate that unexpectedness and stimulus infrequency have qualitatively different suppressive effects on the motor system. They also have key implications for studies that seek to disentangle neural and psychological processes related to motor inhibition and stimulus detection.


F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Nouf Al Backer ◽  
Koloud Ateeq Alharbi ◽  
Abdulrahman Alfahadi ◽  
Syed Shahid Habib ◽  
Shahid Bashir

Background: The neuropsychological tests and its subtests are composed of the motor planning task; simple reaction time task and the intradimensional/extradimensional shift (IED) task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) were developed to examine specific components of cognition. The main objective of this study was to examine the reliability of these CANTAB subtests in pediatric patients with learning disabilities (LD) in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We administered the CANTAB subset test to 92 participants with LD and 68 controls with no LD. The tests performed were motor planning task (MOT), simple reaction time task (SRT) and the intradimensional/extradimensional shift (IED). Results: There was no significant age difference between the case and the control group (case: 9.2 ± 2.4 years versus controls: 9.0 ± 1.6 years, p=0.544). The IED and MOT were significantly longer among patients with LD versus control (p <0.001). LD cases had a longer SRT time than controls (cases: 1050.4 ± 626.5 versus controls: 815.5 ± 133.9, p=0.003). LD patients completed an average of 3.0 stages, than the controls, who were able to complete a mean of 8.4 IED stages (p<0.001). SRT was significantly longer in the case group (965.9 ± 716.4) compared to the controls (747.7 ± 120.7, p=0.014). LD cases made more errors in the motor screening tasks (MOT-Error) compared to the control group (case: 14.6 ± 4.5 versus controls: 12.4 ± 2.7, p<0.001). Conclusion: Patients with LD have poor CANTAB subtest results. If these CANTAB subtests do measure cognitive function, this adds to the accumulating evidence of cognitive impairment association in LD, and such studies should remain an active area of research.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esin Karahan ◽  
Alison G. Costigan ◽  
Kim S. Graham ◽  
Andrew D. Lawrence ◽  
Jiaxiang Zhang

AbstractThe speed of voluntary reaction to an external stimulus varies substantially between individuals and is impaired in ageing. However, the neuroanatomical origins of inter-individual variability in reaction time (RT) remain largely unknown. Here, we combined a cognitive model of RT and a biophysical compartmental model of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to characterize the relationship between RT and microstructure of the corticospinal tract (CST) and the optic radiation (OR), the primary motor output and visual input pathways associated with visual-motor responses.We fitted an accumulator model of RT to 46 female participants’ behavioral performance in a simple reaction time task. The non-decision time parameter (Ter) derived from the model was used to account for the latencies of stimulus encoding and action initiation. From multi-shell DWI data, we quantified tissue microstructure of the CST and OR with the neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) model as well as the conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) model.Using novel skeletonization and segmentation approaches, we showed that DWI-based microstructure metrics varied substantially along CST and OR. The Ter of individual participants was negatively correlated with the NODDI measure of the neurite density in the bilateral superior CST. At an uncorrected threshold, the Ter positively correlated with the DTI measure of fractional anisotropy in an anterior segment of left OR. Further, we found no significant correlation between the microstructural measures and mean RT. Thus, our findings suggest a link between the inter-individual variability of sensorimotor speed and selective microstructural properties in white matter tracts.


Children ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nouf Al Backer ◽  
Malak Jaafar ◽  
Hafiz Habibullah ◽  
Shahid Bashir

Background: Sleep concerns are common in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The impact of poor sleep on cognitive performance in ASD children is not well-established. We investigated the possible correlation between sleep quality in ASD children and cognitive performance. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) was administered to examine specific components of non-verbal cognition. Methods: The Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) and actigraphy-measured data from 18 children with diagnosis of ASD were evaluated. Motor planning task (MOT), simple reaction time task (SRT) and the intradimensional/extradimensional shift (IED) of CANTAB were administered. Results: ASD good sleeper (ASD-GS) showed significant better response time for SRT task as compared to ASD poor sleeper (ASD-PS) based on CSHQ score. Parameters of bedtime resistance (r = 0.531, p = 0.023), sleep anxiety (r = 0.474, p = 0.047) from CSHQ and actigrapgy dependent (wake after sleep onset (WASO) (r = 0.430, p = 0.024) were significantly correlate with response time of SRT task. Conclusion: We conclude that some signs reflecting the presence of poor sleep in ASD correlate with various aspects of motor output on non-verbal performance tasks. The question is raised whether poor sleep in non-complaining persons with autism should be treated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document