A Grade-Six Reading Level Key for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised

1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 883-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Lubin ◽  
Rodney Van Whitlock ◽  
Melinda R. Rea
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
College Students ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health Center ◽  
Mental Health Center ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Check List ◽  
Reliability Measures ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Affect Adjective

A scoring key containing adjectives from the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R) at or below the Grade 6 reading level (MAACL–R6) was used to rescore data from two nonreferred samples (college students, ns = 52 and 78) and one referred sample of 202 from a community mental health center outpatient clinic. Reliability (measures of internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (correlations with five 5–point self-rating mood scales) were almost as high as those for the MAACL–R, and convergence among the MAACL–R6 scales was not increased. Means for the referred group were significantly higher.

A Grade Four Reading Level Key for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised

1998 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Lubin ◽  
Rodney Van Whitlock
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health Center ◽  
Mental Health Center ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Check List ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Affect Adjective ◽  
Three Factor

Data from samples of College Students ( n = 433), Adolescents ( n = 746), and a community mental health center sample (Outpatients) ( n = 202) were re-scored using a scoring key that consisted of adjectives from the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised at or below the Grade 4 reading level (MAACL–R4). Factor analyses showed that, unlike the MAACL–R, a three-factor structure (Positive Affect 4, Anxious Depression 4, and Hostility 4) best described the 38 Grade 4 adjectives on the MAACL–R4. Estimates of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) for each scale were acceptable. Correlations between scores on MAACL–R4 and four Self-rating Mood Scales showed expected convergent and discriminant validities. Also, patterns of means among the three groups could differentiate the nonreferred from referred samples.

Integrated Care Case Study: A Community Mental Health Center and a Federally Qualified Health Center

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Cato-Degroff ◽  
Brian Desantis ◽  
Fred Michel ◽  
Michael D. Welch ◽  
Kelly Phillips-Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Community Mental Health Center ◽  
Mental Health Center ◽  
Federally Qualified Health Center

Adaptation of Group-Based Suicide Intervention for Latinx Youth in a Community Mental Health Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 2058-2069
Author(s):  
Beth Kennard ◽  
Alexandra Moorehead ◽  
Sunita Stewart ◽  
Ana El-Behadli ◽  
Hayden Mbroh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Community Mental Health Center ◽  
Mental Health Center ◽  
Suicide Intervention ◽  
Latinx Youth

Validity and Reliability of the Eysenck Personality Inventory with Outpatients

1982 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 541-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Gabrys
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Community Mental Health ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Community Mental Health Center ◽  
Mental Health Center ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Research Tool ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Reliability Study ◽  
Eysenck Personality Inventory

A validity and reliability study of the Eysenck Personality Inventory, Form A and Form B, is reported for 274 females and 303 male outpatients attending a community mental health center. Findings were similar to those published for randomized samples. The present study helped to sustain interest in the inventory as a research tool with psychological outpatients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document