Responding under a Constant-Probability Schedule of Electric Shock Presentation

1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 907-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. McKearney

In squirrel monkeys responding under a continuous avoidance schedule, addition of a 3-min. constant-probability variable-interval schedule of response-produced shock (concurrent avoidance 3-min. VI) increased responding. When the avoidance schedule was eliminated, so that the only consequence of responding was the presentation of response-dependent shock under the VI schedule, characteristic VI patterns of responding were maintained. In other monkeys already responding under a 3-min. VI schedule without the constant-probability feature, characteristic patterns of responding were also maintained under the constant-probability schedule. Schedule-appropriate performances are maintained under VI schedules of shock presentation in which there is little relation between probability that a given response will be shocked and the time that has passed since the last shock, i.e., a constant-probability schedule. Substantial shock-free periods just after shock are not necessary for responding to be engendered and maintained under schedules of shock presentation.

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-489
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Doleys ◽  
Robert S. Davidson

Gradually increased electric shock was superimposed on responding maintained on a VI 60-sec. schedule of reinforcement. Shock was contingent upon the reinforcement producing response and preceded reinforcement delivery. Following total response suppression, shock was removed and then reintroduced at selected intensities. The previously observed monotonic linear relationship between rate of responding and shock intensity was not recorded. Rather, post-reinforcement response bursts and two distinct patterns of response facilitation emerged.


1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 1015-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Barrett ◽  
John R. Glowa

In daily sessions, lever-pressing by each of two squirrel monkeys was maintained under two different conditions. During one condition responding that had been maintained initially under a 5-min. fixed-interval schedule of food presentation was suppressed when every 30th response produced an electric shock. In the presence of a different discriminative stimulus responding that initially postponed electric shock (avoidance) was ultimately maintained when responding instead produced shock under a 5-min. fixed-interval schedule. Thus responding was suppressed by shock presentation during one condition (punishment) and was maintained by the presentation of an identical shock during a second condition (reinforcement). Whether an environmental stimulus exerts reinforcing or punishing effects on behavior can depend on characteristics other than the nature of the event.


1969 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gottwald

9 male hooded rats were trained to press a lever for food on a variable interval schedule of reinforcement. They received 40 1-hr. sessions on 1 of 4 temporally defined schedules of conditioned suppression. A new procedure was then designed. Ss received 15 sessions in which electric shock occurred either at the end of programmed stimulus periods or contingent upon the first response emitted after onset of the last minute in stimulus. A significant punishment effect of contingent shock was observed ( p < .01) that was mostly due to shock closely following a whole sequence of responses. The usefulness of the behavioral baseline thus obtained for the study of psychotropic drugs is discussed.


1956 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald G. Conrad ◽  
Murray Sidman

3 rhesus monkeys were given various concentrations of sucrose for lever pressing on a variable interval schedule of reinforcement. 7 sucrose concentrations were studied at 2 levels of food deprivation. The response rates accelerated rapidly with increasing concentrations, and then declined after reaching a maximum, generally between 15 and 30% sucrose concentration. The decline was attributed to a satiation effect. The higher level of food deprivation tended to increase the response rate at all but the extreme high and low concentrations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document