Possible Artifacts in Memory Assessment with the Wechsler Memory Scale–III

2001 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 869-870
Author(s):  
E. Robert Sinnett ◽  
Michael C. Holen

The Wechsler Memory Scale–III has a number of subtests on which scores can be influenced by random answering, malingering, and response sets as well as valid variance from memory functioning. Clinicians, researchers, and forensic psychologists need to take these possibly confounding sources into account when interpreting findings. Chance performance guidelines are presented along with some brief examples from clinical assessment.

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Montserrat Alegret ◽  
Ana Espinosa ◽  
Marta Ibarria ◽  
Pilar Cañabate ◽  
Mercè Boada

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-356
Author(s):  
L.A. Lazarus ◽  
M. Small ◽  
J.M. Williams ◽  
S. Koffler

1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Millis ◽  
Aaron C. Malina ◽  
Dana A. Bowers ◽  
Joseph H. Ricker

1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Cumming ◽  
Phillipa Hay ◽  
Teresa Lee ◽  
Perminder Sachdev

Seventeen obsessive-compulsive disorder patients treated with psychosurgery were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Their performance on neuropsychological testing was compared with that of an age and severity matched sample of 17 OCD sufferers who had not received psychosurgery. The psychosurgery and control groups did not differ in intellectual or memory functioning, consistent with earlier findings that psychosurgery does not reduce global ability estimates. The psychosurgery group performed more poorly than the control group on an adaptation of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, demonstrating the possible impact of frontal lobe lesions on the abilities underpinning the formation and shifting of response sets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document