PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE MINNESOTA TEST OF CRITICAL THINKING

2004 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAIRD R. O. EDMAN
2004 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laird R. O. Edman ◽  
Jennifer Robey ◽  
William M. Bart ◽  
Jenzi Silverman

With the increase over the past two decades in interest in critical thinking instruction, reliable and valid means for measuring critical thinking are necessary. The Minnesota Test of Critical Thinking was developed to measure critical thinking as defined by the American Philosophical Association in 1990. The present purpose was to explore the structure and reliability of the intervention and its instantiation of the critical thinking framework. Analyses of responses from 151 adult participants gave estimates of reliability varying from .29 to .78. A factor analysis of the test scores supported critical thinking conceptualized as a single, latent trait. With further refinement, the invention should become a valuable measure of general critical thinking skills of upper-division secondary and postsecondary students.


2000 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Behar-Horenstein ◽  
TA Dolan ◽  
FJ Courts ◽  
GS Mitchell

1999 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Barbara Shadden
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Claudia Moatti ◽  
Janet Lloyd ◽  
Malcolm Schofield

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Jiang ◽  
Ang Gao ◽  
Baiyin Yang

Abstract. This study uses implicit voice theory to examine the influence of employees’ critical thinking and leaders’ inspirational motivation on employees’ voice behavior via voice efficacy. The results of a pretest of 302 employees using critical thinking questionnaires and a field study of 273 dyads of supervisors and their subordinates revealed that both employees’ critical thinking and leaders’ inspirational motivation had a positive effect on employees’ voice and that voice efficacy mediates the relationships among employees’ critical thinking, leaders’ inspirational motivation, and employees’ voice. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Marek ◽  
Chris Randall
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Mayer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document