scholarly journals Stimulus response compatibility affects duration judgments, not the rate of subjective time

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-163
Author(s):  
Alexander Varakin ◽  
Amanda Renfro ◽  
Jason Hays

AbstractThe current experiments examined whether non-temporal associations can affect duration judgments without affecting the rate of subjective time. In both experiments, participants performed a temporal bisection task, judging on each trial whether stimulus’ duration was closer to pre-learned short or long standards. In each experiment, the spatial compatibility between stimuli and responses was manipulated. In both experiments, stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) affected duration judgments: stimuli that were spatially compatible with the key used for long judgments elicited long responses at shorter objective durations than stimuli that were compatible with the key used for short judgments. The size of SRC’s effect did not depend on the magnitude of the standard durations and SRC’s effect was magnified even when SRC was introduced after the relevant temporal interval had ended. Thus, these findings are consistent with the idea that duration judgments can be affected without influencing the rate at which subjective time passes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1249-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Böffel ◽  
J. Müsseler

Abstract When people take the perspective of an avatar and perform a stimulus-response compatibility task, they generally show the same compatibility effects that are expected from the avatar’s position instead of their own. In this study, we investigated if these effects are caused by automatic response activation, a concept featured in dual-route models of stimulus-response compatibility. In two experiments we asked 24 participants each to perform a compatibility task from an avatar’s point of view. We introduced a delay between the presentation of the target and the avatar in half of the trials so that the participants had to wait until the avatar appeared to select the correct response. Because the automatic response activation is known to decay quickly, its influence is eliminated in this condition. In contrast to the prediction by the automatic response activation account, we observed a larger compatibility effect in the delayed condition with orthogonal (Experiment 1) and parallel (Experiment 2) stimulus-response pairings. Additionally, distributional analyses of the compatibility effects did not support the automaticity predictions. We conclude that these results call into question the role of automatic response activation for spatial compatibility in general and perspective-based compatibility effects in particular.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Cambraia ◽  
Marco Vasconcelos ◽  
Jérémie Jozefowiez ◽  
Armando Machado

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document