scholarly journals Measures of Downside Risk Under Conditions of Downturn in the Real Estate Market

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafał Wolski

Abstract Some authors suggest that the use of standard deviation as a measure of total risk for returns on real estate leads to risk overestimation, as the classical Markowitz model does not account for the skewness of financial data, thus making the results unreliable. According to the available literature, risk calculated on the basis of standard semideviation may actually better reflect the nature of property investment. However, in this context, the question of whether or not this measure will lead to risk underestimation at a time of a downturn in the real estate market, resulting in inadequate investment decisions aggravating investor losses arises. Therefore, the present paper presents portfolios constructed using either classical risk measures or measures based on “downside deviations” of rates of return. The results of investment in these portfolios are analyzed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Pandey ◽  
V. Mary Jessica

Purpose This study aims to investigate the behavioural biases influencing the real estate market investing decisions of normal non-professional investors in India. Design/methodology/approach As the study involves the behavioural data with polytomous response format, psychometric test- graded response model (IRT approach) was used for the study with the help of STATA 14. Multi-stage stratified sampling was used to collect a sample of 560 respondents. The study used a 14-item scale representing behavioural biases derived from two broad behavioural theories, i.e. heuristics and prospect theories. Sample characteristics were checked using SPSS 20. Pre-required assumptions for IRT (i.e. local independence and unidimensionality) were tested by CFA using AMOS 20. Findings Five items, four of which belong to heuristics (anchoring – 2, representativeness – 1 and availability bias – 1) and one belong to prospect theory (regret aversion) are sufficient to measure the behavioural attitude of real estate investors in the Indian scenario. Item discrimination ai ranged from 0.95 to 1.52 (average value 1.29), showing moderate discrimination power of the items. The items have done a pretty good job of assessing the lower level of agreement. For the higher level of agreement, the scale came out to be less precise, with less information and higher standard error of measurement. Research limitations/implications As the behavioural biases are often false, the study suggests the investors not to repeat these nasty biases to improve investment strategies. As they are shared and not easily changeable, understanding these biases may also help them in beating the market by acting as “noise traders”. Practical implications The traditional price index is incomplete in some essential respects. The inclusion of these behavioural biases into the construction of price index will greatly improve the traditional price index, policymakers should seriously think about it. Social implications Shelter is one of the basic needs; a dwelling unit is needed for one to stay in, develop and contribute to economy and society. If investors try to minimise these biases and policymakers keep a track of these while making strategies, mispricing in this sector can be controlled to some extent, which will ultimately help in the well-being of society. Originality/value This study contributes to the limited research by investigating the behavioural biases influencing the real estate market investment decisions of normal non-professional investors. It contributes to the lacking academe on real estate market in India. The study has used a psychometric test, i.e. the item response theory, for evaluating the quality of the items.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Andrejs Čirjevskis

The real estate market of EU countries has undergone a severe global financial crisis 2008–2009, recovered successfully later, and now experiencing significant uncertainty due to the COVID-19 pandemic event. Significant volatility of the real estate business is once again evident, just as it was following the global financial crisis. The paper aims to provide a case study of a real estate project by giving insight into the Latvian real estate project that had been experiencing similar economic uncertainty, to demonstrate hybrid real options valuation (ROV) method to adapt real estate investments to changing circumstances and to develop the decision-making solution to similar EU real estate problems during the pandemic. The paper provides the “step-by-step” ROV application’s methodology in real estate development projects. The presented methodology is a powerful managerial risk management tool for the executives of similar real estate development projects in the EU countries struggling to make investment decisions in the pandemic and post-pandemic period. Since any estimation includes assumptions, ROV results should be interpreted and perceived as approximations only. The future works can provide robust ROV analyses and interpretations regarding the demand for real estate, showing quantitatively how competition can impact strategic investment decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document