scholarly journals Severe brain trauma injury: when no intracranial pressure monitoring is available

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-150
Author(s):  
Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar ◽  
Guru Dutta Satyarthee ◽  
Alexis Rafael Narvaez-Rojas
2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1543-1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
Elizabeth Benjamin ◽  
Desmond Khor ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Lydia Lam ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 (3a) ◽  
pp. 390-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio L. E Falcão ◽  
Venâncio P. Dantas Filho ◽  
Luiz A. C. Sardinha ◽  
Elizabeth M. A. B. Quagliato ◽  
Desanka Dragosavac ◽  
...  

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was carried out in 100 patients with severe acute brain trauma, primarily by means of a subarachnoid catheter. Statistical associations were evaluated between maximum ICP values and: 1) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores; 2) findings on computed tomography (CT) scans of the head; and 3) mortality. A significant association was found between low GCS scores (3 to 5) and high ICP levels, as well as between focal lesions on CT scans and elevated ICP. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with ICP > 40 mm Hg than in those with ICP < 20 mm Hg.


2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 461-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Kostic ◽  
Ivan Stefanovic ◽  
Vesna Novak ◽  
Dragan Veselinovic ◽  
Goran Ivanov ◽  
...  

Since without prospective randomized studies it is not possible to have a clear attitude towards the importance of intracranial pressure monitoring, this study was aimed at examining the prognostic effect of the intracranial pressure monitoring and intracranial pressure oriented therapy in severe brain trauma patients, and at defining optimal intracranial pressure values for starting the treatment. Two groups of patients were treated in the study, one consisted of 32 patients undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring and the second group of 29 patients without intracranial pressure monitoring in the control group. The study was prospective with groups randomized. There were 53% survivals in the intracranial pressure monitored patients and 34% in the control group, with no significant difference in the survival rate between the two groups (?2=2.11; p=0.15; p>0.05). The average intracranial pressure in the patients with intracranial hypertension who died was 27 mm Hg, while in the patients who survived the average intracranial pressure was significantly lower (Student?s t test: t=2.91; p=0.008; p<0.01) and it was 18 mm Hg. We recommend starting intracranial pressure oriented therapy when the patient?s intracranial pressure exceeds 18 mmHg during 2 hours of monitoring.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1542-1542
Author(s):  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
Elizabeth Benjamin ◽  
Desmond Khor ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Lydia Lam ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S-45-S-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Bratton ◽  
Randall M. Chestnut ◽  
Jamshid Ghajar ◽  
Flora F. McConnell Hammond ◽  
Odette A. Harris ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-133
Author(s):  
Barnaby R. Scholefield ◽  
Kevin P. Morris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document