scholarly journals Use of a Video Module to Improve Faculty Understanding of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal Deas ◽  
Angela R Thomason ◽  
Robert M Riggs ◽  
Michael C. Thomas ◽  
Michael G. Kendrach

Objective: To evaluate change in faculty’s knowledge and perceptions after an online video module on the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP). Innovation: An educational video module on the PPCP was developed and disseminated to full-time faculty members at Samford University, McWhorter School of Pharmacy. Voluntary and anonymous pre- and post-test assessments were evaluated and analyzed. Critical Analysis: Thirty faculty completed the pre-assessment, and 31 completed the post-assessment (73% and 75% response rates, respectively). A significant improvement in faculty perceptions was indicated by an increase in agreement with the majority (80%) of questions on attitudes toward the PPCP on the post-test. Faculty’s knowledge of the introduction and assessment of PPCP within the school’s curriculum was significantly increased after viewing the video module. After viewing the module, more faculty were also able to correctly identify the majority of the PPCP components and their corresponding practice activities. Next Steps: A short video module was effective at improving faculty knowledge and perceptions of the PPCP. Development of a similar faculty development module is feasible for implementation in other Schools of Pharmacy. Conflict of Interest We declare no conflicts of interest or financial interests that the authors or members of their immediate families have in any product or service discussed in the manuscript, including grants (pending or received), employment, gifts, stock holdings or options, honoraria, consultancies, expert testimony, patents and royalties. Treatment of Human Subjects: IRB exemption granted   Type: Note

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Kolar ◽  
Keri D. Hager ◽  
Victoria Losinski

The adoption of a standard pharmacists’ patient care process (PPCP) for the profession, and inclusion of the PPCP in the ACPE Standards 2016, are positive steps for pharmacy education and creates consistency among pharmacy practitioners, regardless of practice setting. The PPCP, and its implications for practice, needs to continue to be embraced by educators and emphasized with students. The PPCP should be the patient care process taught to students and integrated throughout didactic courses and experiential experiences. However, teaching the PPCP or a particular service, such as Medication Therapy Management (MTM) or Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM), is not enough. The patient care process must be taught as one component of pharmaceutical care. Without also learning the philosophy of practice and practice management systems, student pharmacists will not be prepared for the realities of practice. Pharmacists are taking on new roles, getting paid in new ways, and in positions to take responsibility for a patient’s medication-related needs. Student pharmacists need to be in a position to take advantage of these opportunities as they progress throughout their careers. Conflict of Interest We declare no conflicts of interest or financial interests that the authors or members of their immediate families have in any product or service discussed in the manuscript, including grants (pending or received), employment, gifts, stock holdings or options, honoraria, consultancies, expert testimony, patents and royalties.   Type: Idea Paper


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (72) ◽  
pp. 027
Author(s):  
А.О. Gavrilyuk ◽  
R.G. Zharlinska ◽  
А.А. Mishchuk ◽  
К.М. Vergeles ◽  
А.М. Berezovskyi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. S114 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Y. Yiadom ◽  
J.B. Hopkins ◽  
J. Imperato ◽  
L. Sanchez ◽  
J. Fisher ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Adams ◽  
Krystalyn Weaver

Objective: Explore the intersection of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP) and state laws in order to identify laws that may impede the delivery of optimal patient care. Summary: A review of the PPCP identified six areas in which state laws can limit full pharmacist engagement: 1) ordering and interpreting laboratory tests; 2) participating in a collaborative practice agreement; 3) independently prescribing certain medications; 4) independently adapting medications; 5) administering medications; and 6) effective delegation. A framework is put forth to organize how these scope of practice matters are interrelated. Conclusion: For pharmacists to fully engage in the PPCP, state laws must enable full participation. By unleashing pharmacists to fully engage in the process, patient care delivery and outcomes can be improved, and total health care costs can be reduced.   Article Type: Commentary


2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 6311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Gonyeau ◽  
Margarita DiVall ◽  
Michael P. Conley ◽  
Jason Lancaster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document