scholarly journals Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Adams ◽  
Krystalyn Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Care Process ◽  
State Laws ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Full Participation ◽  
Collaborative Practice Agreement ◽  
Patient Care Delivery ◽  
Patient Care Process

Objective: Explore the intersection of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP) and state laws in order to identify laws that may impede the delivery of optimal patient care. Summary: A review of the PPCP identified six areas in which state laws can limit full pharmacist engagement: 1) ordering and interpreting laboratory tests; 2) participating in a collaborative practice agreement; 3) independently prescribing certain medications; 4) independently adapting medications; 5) administering medications; and 6) effective delegation. A framework is put forth to organize how these scope of practice matters are interrelated. Conclusion: For pharmacists to fully engage in the PPCP, state laws must enable full participation. By unleashing pharmacists to fully engage in the process, patient care delivery and outcomes can be improved, and total health care costs can be reduced.   Article Type: Commentary

Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: State “Scope of Practice” Priorities for Action

2020 ◽  
pp. 106002802095019
Author(s):  
Alex J. Adams ◽  
Krystalyn K. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
State Level ◽  
Support Staff ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Collaborative Practice Agreement ◽  
Patient Care Process

To fully engage in the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process, pharmacists must be able to (1) participate in a Collaborative Practice Agreement, (2) order and interpret laboratory tests, (3) prescribe certain medications, (4) adapt medications, (5) administer medications, and (6) effectively delegate tasks to support staff. Each of these activities is dependent on state scope of practice laws, but these laws are not binary. Various state-level restrictions allow us to view these activities on a continuum from more restrictive to less restrictive. This continuum will allow pharmacy and public health stakeholders to identify priorities for action in their states.

IMPROVEMENT OF THE PATIENT CARE PROCESS BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF CLINICAL AUDIT

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (72) ◽  
pp. 027
Author(s):  
А.О. Gavrilyuk ◽  
R.G. Zharlinska ◽  
А.А. Mishchuk ◽  
К.М. Vergeles ◽  
А.М. Berezovskyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Audit ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Patient Care Process

scholarly journals Linking the Unitary Paradigm to Policy through a Synthesis of Caring Science and Integrative Nursing

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary S. Koithan ◽  
Mary Jo Kreitzer ◽  
Jean Watson
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Healthcare Policy ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Nursing Knowledge ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Caring Science ◽  
Patient Care Delivery

The principles of integrative nursing and caring science align with the unitary paradigm in a way that can inform and shape nursing knowledge, patient care delivery across populations and settings, and new healthcare policy. The proposed policies may transform the healthcare system in a way that supports nursing praxis and honors the discipline’s unitary paradigm. This call to action provides a distinct and hopeful vision of a healthcare system that is accessible, equitable, safe, patient-centered, and affordable. In these challenging times, it is the unitary paradigm and nursing wisdom that offer a clear path forward.

scholarly journals Advancing the Adoption of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in the United States

Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
James A. Owen ◽  
Jann B. Skelton ◽  
Lucinda L. Maine
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
United States ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Professional Competence ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pharmacy Education ◽  
Development Plans ◽  
Patient Care Delivery

Over the last four decades, the expanded patient care roles of pharmacists in the United States (U.S.) have increased focus on ensuring the implementation of processes to enhance continuing professional development within the profession. The transition from a model of continuing pharmacy education (CPE) to a model of continuing professional development (CPD) is still evolving. As pharmacists assume more complex roles in patient care delivery, particularly in community-based settings, the need to demonstrate and maintain professional competence becomes more critical. In addition, long-held processes for post-graduate education and licensure must also continue to adapt to meet these changing needs. Members of the pharmacy profession in the U.S. must adopt the concept of CPD and implement processes to support the thoughtful completion of professional development plans. Comprehensive, state-of-the-art technology solutions are available to assist pharmacists with understanding, implementing and applying CPD to their professional lives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document