Late Phase Inflammation during Nasal Grass and Ragweed Challenge in a Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial with Astemizole

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Frieri ◽  
James Madden ◽  
Myron Zitt ◽  
Nanjundaiah S. Kumar ◽  
Maria Knapik
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Nasal Provocation ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

Allergic rhinitis is an IgE-mediated inflammatory reaction characterized by an early “classic” immediate hypersensitivity response and/or a subsequent late phase response. Nasal provocation to antigen challenge is a useful method of evaluating this dual response. Several H1 antagonists may exhibit antiinflammatory properties by diminishing histamine release or inhibiting eosinophil chemotaxis. To determine whether astemizole has any anti-inflammatory characteristics, we studied 20 patients with allergic rhinitis in a double-blind placebo-controlled fashion after a 4-week course of treatment with this H1 antagonist. Nasal provocation over 30 minutes was performed out of season using increasing concentrations of grass or ragweed extract from 10–1000 PNU. Patients were evaluated for their clinical response, and nasal lavage secretions were analyzed over 6 hours by ELISA for alpha interleukin-1, interleukin-8, albumin, and histamine levels. Total sneezing and other symptom scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and pruritus were decreased in astemizole-treated compared to placebo-treated patients both at 30 minutes (early phase), and at 3 and 6 hours (late phase) after nasal provocation. However, these results did not reach statistical significance. Nasal α IL-1 levels diminished from diluent control lavage to a significantly greater degree in astemizole than in placebo-treated patients (P < 0.05). This diminution in late phase α IL-1 suggests that astemizole may possess anti-inflammatory properties.

Nasal Immunotherapy is Effective in the Treatment of Rhinitis Due to Mite Allergy. A Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Study with Rhinological Evaluations

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Passàli ◽  
L. Bellussi ◽  
G.C. Passàli ◽  
F. M. Passàli
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Mucociliary Clearance ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Nasal Provocation ◽  
Mite Allergy ◽  
Perennial Rhinitis

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal hyposensitizing therapy in perennial rhinitis. 36 patients suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis (Dermatophagoides-sensitive) underwent a double blind placebo-controlled trial for a period of 8 months. The efficacy of nasal immunotherapy was evaluated by collecting symptoms score and evaluating objective rhinological parameters (nasal resistance, cross areas and volumes, mucociliary clearance times, specific nasal provocation threshold). A significant improvement (p0,01) of symptom score of active against placebo group was observed after treatment. Also objective nasal parameters (total nasal resistances, mucociliary clearance, C-notch area, and provocative threshold) significantly (p0,01) improved after treatment. Adverse local reactions were rare and did not interfere with the protocol. The results underline the efficacy and quickness of local nasal immunotherapy in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis documented by the improvement of subjective and objective parameters.

scholarly journals Immunogenic yeast-based fermentation product reduces allergic rhinitis-induced nasal congestion: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 795-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Moyad ◽  
Larry E. Robinson ◽  
Julie M. Kittelsrud ◽  
Stuart G. Reeves ◽  
Susan E. Weaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Fermentation Product

scholarly journals Correction to: Immunogenic Yeast-Based Fermentation Product Reduces Allergic Rhinitis-Induced Nasal Congestion: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 2191-2191
Author(s):  
Mark A. Moyad ◽  
Larry E. Robinson ◽  
Julie M. Kittelsrud ◽  
Stuart G. Reeves ◽  
Susan E. Weaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Fermentation Product

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Levocabastine-Oxymetazoline Nasal Spray with Levocabastine and Oxymetazoline Alone in the Symptomatic Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Busse ◽  
Monique Janssens ◽  
Gerald Eisen ◽  
Eastern Us ◽  
Canada William Busse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Nasal Spray ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Entire Treatment Period

A total of 1015 patients participated in three 1-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials undertaken to assess the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of twice daily administration of a nasal spray containing a combination of levocabastine (0.5 mg/mL) and oxymetazoline (0.5 mg/mL) (levocabastine-D) versus that of either agent alone in the treatment of ragweed-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. As these studies shared a common protocol, the data have been pooled. Patient assessments revealed that the mean change in area under the curve (AUC) from baseline over the entire treatment period was significantly greater in patients treated with levocabastine or levocabastine-D than in those receiving placebo for all symptoms evaluated (nasal congestion; P < 0.05 and sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, ocular symptoms, total key symptoms, total all symptoms; P < 0.001). Corresponding changes in patients treated with oxymetazoline alone did not attain statistical significance. Day-by-day analysis demonstrated that the beneficial effects seen with levocabastine and levocabastine-D were maintained throughout the treatment period for all symptoms except nasal congestion (Days 1 and 2 only); oxymetazoline provided significant relief from nasal congestion only and only on the first day of treatment. Investigator assessments revealed similar trends. Global evaluations of therapeutic efficacy revealed that 44% of levocabastine-treated patients and 52% of patients treated with levocabastine-D considered therapeutic efficacy to be excellent or good compared with 39% of those on oxymetazoline and 26% on placebo (P < 0.01 versus placebo). Adverse experiences were reported by 30% of levocabastine-treated patients, 40% of patients treated with levocabastine-D and oxymetazoline, and 32% of placebo controls, with no statistically significant intergroup differences in incidence or type. In conclusion, twice daily levocabastine nasal spray is effective and well-tolerated for the treatment of ragweed-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis with an adverse effect profile comparable with that of placebo. Addition of oxymetazoline to the topical antihistamine does not appear to provide significant additional clinical benefit compared to that observed with levocabastine alone, and tachyphylaxis to the decongestant effect of the topical vasoconstrictor occurs within days of treatment initiation.

scholarly journals Intralymphatic immunotherapy with tyrosine-adsorbed allergens: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Jung Park ◽  
Sae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Yoo Seob Shin ◽  
Chul Hwan Park ◽  
Eun-Suk Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Injection Site ◽  
Symptom Score ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Medication Score ◽  
Allergen Extracts

Abstract Background Most previous studies used aluminum hydroxide-absorbed allergen extracts in evaluating the potential therapeutic roles of intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy (ILAIT). In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of ILAIT with L-tyrosine-adsorbed allergen extracts of Dermatophagoides farinae, D. pteronyssinus, cat, dog, or mixtures thereof, in patients with allergic rhinitis induced by these allergens. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, study subjects received three intralymphatic injections of L-tyrosine-adsorbed allergen extracts (active group) or saline (placebo group) at 4-week intervals. Results Although ILAIT reduced daily medication use and skin reactivity to HDM and cat allergens at 4 months after treatment, overall symptom score on a visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), daily symptom score (dSS), daily medication score (dMS), daily symptom medication score (dSMS), nasal reactivity to HDM allergen, and basophil activity to HDM, cat, and dog allergens at 4 months and 1 year after treatment were similar between the treatment and control groups. Intralymphatic injection was more painful than a venous puncture, and pain at the injection site was the most frequent local adverse event (12.8%); dyspnea and wheezing were the most common systemic adverse events (5.3%). Conclusions ILAIT with L-tyrosine-adsorbed allergen extracts does not exhibit profound therapeutic efficacy in allergic rhinitis and can provoke moderate-to-severe systemic reactions and cause pain at the injection site. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02665754; date of registration: 28 January 2016

scholarly journals Morinda citrifolia(Noni) as an Anti-Inflammatory Treatment in Women with Primary Dysmenorrhoea: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Fletcher ◽  
J. Dawkins ◽  
C. Rattray ◽  
G. Wharfe ◽  
M. Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Morinda Citrifolia ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Menstrual Cycles ◽  
Primary Dysmenorrhoea ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Laboratory Variables ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Bleeding Score

Introduction. Noni (Morinda citrifolia) has been used for many years as an anti-inflammatory agent. We tested the efficacy of Noni in women with dysmenorrhea.Method. We did a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 100 university students of 18 years and older over three menstrual cycles. Patients were invited to participate and randomly assigned to receive 400 mg Noni capsules or placebo. They were assessed for baseline demographic variables such as age, parity, and BMI. They were also assessed before and after treatment, for pain, menstrual blood loss, and laboratory variables: ESR, hemoglobin, and packed cell volume.Results. Of the 1027 women screened, 100 eligible women were randomized. Of the women completing the study, 42 women were randomized to Noni and 38 to placebo. There were no significant differences in any of the variables at randomization. There were also no significant differences in mean bleeding score or pain score at randomization. Both bleeding and pain scores gradually improved in both groups as the women were observed over three menstrual cycles; however, the improvement was not significantly different in the Noni group when compared to the controls.Conclusion. Noni did not show a reduction in menstrual pain or bleeding when compared to placebo.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Reformulated Azelastine Nasal Spray in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Bernstein ◽  
Bruce Prenner ◽  
Berrylin J. Ferguson ◽  
Jay Portnoy ◽  
William J. Wheeler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Spray ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Taste Masking ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Original Formulation ◽  
Double Blind

Background Azelastine nasal spray is a topical antihistamine with a distinctive taste that may be objectionable to some patients. The primary objectives of this clinical trial were (1) to determine if a reformulated azelastine nasal spray (Astepro) with sucralose as a taste-masking agent provides comparable efficacy to the original formulation (Astelin) and (2) to evaluate dose–response relationships between groups. Methods Eight hundred thirty-five patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomized to six treatment groups: (1) original azelastine nasal spray, 1 spray/nostril b.i.d.; (2) reformulated azelastine, 1 spray/nostril b.i.d.; (3) placebo, 1 spray/nostril b.i.d.; (4) original azelastine nasal spray, 2 sprays/nostril b.i.d., (5) reformulated, 2 sprays/nostril b.i.d.; and (6) placebo, 2 sprays/nostril b.i.d. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to day 14 in total nasal symptom score (TNSS) consisting of runny nose, sneezing, itchy nose, and nasal congestion. Results Original azelastine nasal spray and the reformulated spray produced comparable improvements in the TNSS at both dosages. There was a dose-related difference in TNSS comparing the 1- and 2-spray dosages. The percentage changes from baseline in the TNSS in the 2-sprays/nostril dosage groups were 27.9% (p < 0.001) with the reformulated nasal spray, 23.5% (p < 0.01) with the original formulation, and 15.4% with placebo. The incidence of bitter taste was 7% with the reformulated spray and 8% with the original at the 2-sprays/nostril dosage. Conclusion The results of this study showed efficacy both with original azelastine nasal spray and with the reformulated nasal spray and a clear dose–response difference between the 1- and 2-spray dosages.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document