scholarly journals 38. A clinical study of secondary bone grafting of cancellous iliac bone on patients with alveolar clefts at the First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Kyushu Dental College

1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-745
Author(s):  
Tomoki Shimamura ◽  
Kazuhiro Tominaga ◽  
Jinichi Fukuda
1990 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1397-1403
Author(s):  
Katsuhiro MINAMI ◽  
Motohiro TSUJINO ◽  
Yoshihide MORI ◽  
Kinya HIGUCHI ◽  
Hiroyuki HAMAGUCHI ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Dempf ◽  
Thomas Teltzrow ◽  
Franz-Josef Kramer ◽  
Jarg-Erich Hausamen

Objective This investigation evaluated the results of alveolar bone grafting in patients with complete clefts, comparing secondary alveolar bone grafting (during the mixed stage of dentition) versus tertiary bone grafting (after completion of the second stage of dentition). Design This was a retrospective study. Of 140 osteoplasties, which all were operated according to the same standardized surgical technique, a clinical and roentgenological follow-up investigation was carried out in a collective of 85 osteoplasties. Clinically we searched for oronasal fistulae, assessed the periodontal status, determined the extent of the gingival attachment in the area of the osteoplasty, and searched for vertical growth disturbances in the area of the osteoplasty. Roentgenologically the height of the alveolar bone in the former clefted area was ascertained. Setting Records were obtained from a clinical and radiological study of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Medical University of Hannover (Germany). Interventions All patients were operated with the same standardized surgical method. The osteoplastic bridging of the alveolar cleft was performed via a vestibular gingival marginal incision and exclusively by grafting of cancellous bone from the iliac crest. Results The best results of alveolar bone grafting in cases of secondary osteoplasty were obtained when the lateral incisor or canine had grown into the transplant and had led to a functional stress of the transplanted bone. Approximately good results were to be found in tertiary osteoplasty when the transplanted bone had been stressed functionally through a dental implant. Comparing the secondary with the tertiary osteoplasty, there was a trend of lower resorption in secondary osteoplasty. Conclusions Secondary osteoplasty should represent an integral component of any concept for the comprehensive treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate.


1997 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu HAYATSU ◽  
Masaki OKAFUJI ◽  
Takanori ISHIMARU ◽  
YUZO MIZUGAKI ◽  
Yuzaburo HIRAKI ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 936-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Na Zhou ◽  
Yong-Chu Pan ◽  
Yan-Chi Tang ◽  
Wei Hou ◽  
Da-Ming Wu ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare osseous outcomes of block and cancellous iliac bone grafting in older unilateral alveolar cleft patients. Design: Retrospective and observational follow-up study. Setting: Cleft Lip and Palate Centre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, China. Patients: Forty-five nonsyndromic patients with unilateral complete alveolar cleft were enrolled in this study (25 patients in block bone graft group and 20 patients in cancellous bone graft group). Interventions: In cancellous bone graft group, the alveolar cleft was filled with iliac cancellous bone particulate. In group of block bone graft, the harvested bone block was trimmed and fixed in alveolar defect. Main Outcome Measures: A novel method was proposed to investigate the volume and density of residual bone graft at 1-week, 3- and 6-month, 1- and 2-year postoperatively based on cone beam computed tomography scans. Results: No difference in bone graft volume was found between 2 groups at 1-week and 3-month postoperatively; however, the residual volume of block bone graft group was significantly larger than that of cancellous bone graft group at 6-month, 1- and 2-year postoperatively. The bone density of block bone graft group was lower at 1-week and 3-month postoperatively but was comparable at 6-month, 1- and 2-year postoperatively. Our method was reliable and accurate to identify the range of residual bone graft when the boundary of grafted bone could not be identified clearly. Conclusion: Block bone graft could achieve comparable bone density and retain a greater amount of residual bone comparing to cancellous bone graft.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document